The rituals we perform and the games we play
anargumentfordeliberation.wordpress.com
anargumentfordeliberation.wordpress.com
I can't imagine a universe where things would have 'meaning' in the manner the author of this post seems to desire. Even if you believe in a God that gives our lives meaning, doesn't that just push up the search for 'meaning' one level? How is God choosing an arbitrary meaning for our lives any different than some other human choosing a meaning for your life?
I can understand being frustrated by the drive for status and recognition, but that doesn't have to be the source for meaning in your life. We can find meaning in all sorts of things in our lives. We can find it in our relationships with our loved ones, in our enjoyment of our favorite activities, in our striving to advance human discovery and understanding of our world. These are things that can have intrinsic meaning, not things that only have meaning in the way they increase our status or grant us some secondary benefit.
I would really suggest reading "Man's Search for Meaning" by Viktor Frankl
Things, events, forms arises for no reason other than for it's own sake. That's not a cause for depression and nihilism. In fact, if you were able to clearly see that, this dance of things arising and passing, created, sustained, and dissolved back into the ground of being -- then you'd see the most beautiful thing you could see.
https://www.nyu.edu/classes/keefer/hell/camus.html
edit: (looking more closely that is probably only 1 of the 4 chapters)
“Vanity of vanities!” says the Teacher, “Vanity of vanities! All is vanity!”
The above is a quote from Ecclesiastes, which, even if you're not religious, is a pretty interesting book, and it seems to sum up pretty much what he is saying.
Fitting enough, shortly after that opening statement in Ecclesiastes this is said.
"What has been—it is what will be; what has been done—it is what will be done; there is nothing new under the sun. There is a thing of which it is said, “Look at this! This is new!” But it already existed in ages past before us."
I don't know the writer but there's a good chance the author (HN userid Jasamba) is a "she".
"It’s as if you are now in the elite of the elites of the monkeys, in the good part of the forest where the trees grow bountiful and most female monkeys would kill to be considered a worthy partner by you, so that they too can perform the successful monkey rituals with you"
That's a bit confused. Normally, you make the most of life because it's entirely real and entirely meaningful.
‘This is what I have observed to be good: that it is appropriate for a person to eat, to drink and to find satisfaction in their toilsome labor under the sun during the few days of life God has given them—for this is their lot.’
So I guess it acknowledges that we are in the pursuit of contentment / satisfaction - not money... at what ever level of ritual we are following
Yeah, sometimes you lose sight about what's beautiful in life. But its the human inside of you who determines whether life is beautiful or not.
Why does anything matter? Is it all just a meaningless "ritual"? Maybe, if you don't care. But that doesn't seem like a very healthy mindset to keep yourself into.
Life only has the meaning that you assign to it. Others will judge you for "meaningless" tasks, or you yourself may feel like things are meaningless at times. That's normal. Congratulations, you've rediscovered existentialism. Now either play the ritual of philosophy and find meaning in that discovery, or play something else.
In any case, seeing life as a serious of "meaningless rituals" ignores the beauty and discovery that life gives us. We all have that phase in our life where we lose meaning, but one day you'll come back around and discover the reason why you continue to march forward.
And at that point, you'll rediscover beauty and adventure. Life will be interesting. Today is not that day for you yet however.
There are mountains in the distance. If you never walk up to the top of the dune, you won't know that, and if you don't make it a habit, you'll quickly forget that you saw them.
Your life can be a procession of views of sand grains in between a few dunes, or it can be a deliberate migration towards the mountains.
We are not terribly far from an ascension that will completely change the human condition, make it irrelevant as to what we our ancestors were in the evolutionary past, and make it possible to choose everything about what we will be. The future is glorious, golden, and accelerating. You can work towards that, or you can choose to ignore it.
There are things that will happen in the future. If you always think about living for the future instead of the present, and you don't make it a habit, you'll quickly forget that you're living in a dream.
Your life can be a procession of day jobs, food, media ad infinitum ad nauseam.
We're not far from all the angels, demons, cyber raptures, and myriad of dogmatic ideologies we want to believe in, if we do, and it makes it possible to choose everything about what we choose to do each day. The future is unwritten.
Nihilism feels so liberating to me. I have thoughts like these daily, they serve to remind me that we don't have to do the rituals if we don't want to. We can do whatever we want. At any moment. And nobody can say it's "wrong" or "bad," because those concepts don't exist in the universe at large. There's no point, there's no meaning, there's no goal - it's an open sandbox. Go play, while you still have the chance!
It's pretty difficult, as an animal brain subject to the illusion, to fully commit to living life that way, but I like to keep it in mind...
I believe in monism - ultimately there is only one thing, or one type of thing. It is not contrasted with anything else[1]. That's why it's not meaningful or meaningless, good or bad, right or wrong - it just "is."
[1] Except, perhaps, complete nothingness, utter void. So in that sense everything that exists is meaningful, and only pure nothingness is meaningless.
Can you have darkness without the concept of light? Simply put, no.
If you'd like another example, how about this... If there were no objects in the Universe, only free space, would gravity exist?
> "I believe in monism - ultimately there is only one thing, or one type of thing. It is not contrasted with anything else[1]. That's why it's not meaningful or meaningless, good or bad, right or wrong - it just "is."
[1] Except, perhaps, complete nothingness, utter void. So in that sense everything that exists is meaningful, and only pure nothingness is meaningless."
Have you considered there's another explanation that is the polar opposite to nihilism? Whilst it may not be what you thought of before, your comments above would suggest you'd be open to that possibility. To start exploring this...
I don't know what to make of a hypothetical like that. It seems nonsensical, just like a universe without light, or the absence of a universe, the concept of pure emptiness or nothingness. We can't conceive of these scenarios because they preclude our own existence and ability to conceive of anything.
Anyway, I'm not sure what you're driving at...was the comment left unfinished for some sort of meta purpose?
Sorry about that, it wasn't my intention. Sometimes I'll leave a post half finished when I'm looking up a link because my phone's web browser has a habit of erasing partially complete comments when I change tabs, so my only reliable option is to post what I have before I'm ready. In this case I took longer than I thought I would to look up a link for you. I won't promise it won't happen again, but I'll try to make what I'm doing clearer next time.
To see the opposite to nihilism, let's first look at interconnectedness. What are your thoughts on the ideas in this video?
I don't see it as the opposite of nihilism, it's two sides of the same coin. When you take it to such an extreme, things break down. Is there no meaning, or is everything meaningful? What's the difference?
Two sides of the same coin is the opposite! Using rough definitions, nihilism is that nothing matters, the opposite (which I don't have a name for) is that everything matters. Taken further, this interconnectedness means that we are all the universe, we are all God. I'd recommend checking out more Alan Watts videos to have this explained better, he looks at it in various ways. Here are a couple of short ones, though I'd recommend his longer talks (I think the music often found on the shorter ones can detract from the clarity of the message sometimes):
Functionally, in terms of how you go about your life, what is the difference between these "opposite" philosophies? I'll check out the videos but my guess is I have already incorporated the ideas.
Another way to think of it is: I don't like Donald Trump. I think what he does is wrong and bad, and it saddens and angers me if I let it. But, if I hold true to my beliefs, then he's just another part of the universe playing itself out, which will continue inexorably regardless of how I feel about it, so there's no sense in getting mad about it.
"Ritual" also implies behavior that is done by rote or under duress. But that leaves out behavior that is done because it is desirable or an expected end of it is desirable. The drive to pursue pleasure does not require an explanation, it is its own explanation, much like the drive to avoid pain requires no explanation either.
> It makes me wonder what would happen to us if we didn’t have any more rituals to perform or standardized games to wake up to.
You describe the absence of all drives, a very unusual state. Sounds like depression, frankly.
We'd develop them again. We didn't get the set we have by accident.
Some variation would be found, certainly, but cultures around the world converged on many similar notions reaching where we are today.
1) James Carse, Finite and Infinite Games, http://amzn.com/1476731713
2) Antoine de St.-Exupéry, Wisdom of the Sands (Fr. Citadelle) http://amzn.com/0226733726
But I think between these two concepts: http://www.alexwg.org/publications/PhysRevLett_110-168702.pd... https://www.quantamagazine.org/20140122-a-new-physics-theory...
there might be an implied purpose to the "universe".
Entropy maximization sounds about just as appealing as an answer as 42.
A lot of our identity is attached to these meaningless rituals and games. However, the one constant in all of it is Awareness. It's here that when one starts trying to find just "who" is aware that things get interesting again. It leads to some place much deeper and goes beyond the existential dread.
Here, consciousness and awareness is not a concept, but the first principle of the universe -- from which the _concept_ of consciousness reflects upon the first principle (without actually being the first principle). It's a key insight that breaks out the nihilism.
-- By "consciousness", I am speaking of awareness, not the constructed identity that most people calls "consciousness".
Go for a walk in the park. Go for a bike ride. Talk to new people, hang out with them. Play some games, don't be a jerk or else people will return the favor.
Embark on an exuberant hedonistic adventure and when you burn out, swim into the ocean and begin an alternative life style.
If you want to leave, you're free to go.
The planet isn't random, it is one that can sustain life in our form. That we don't know everything about our existence, that we have to piece it together as best we can, and share our findings with the next generation, is all very exciting and amazing and awesome to me. I guess I am just the type of person who loves open world games :)
Also, it makes me get less upset when I see shitty things in the world - the fact that life that is just evolving to survive can get our shit together as well as humanity has, is frankly pretty amazing and impressive.
You lament that you run into so many people who care about those things, and they are blind to the fragile and fleeting nature of it all, but I am unsure why that is such a horrible thing. Everyone is going to choose their own meaning for their lives, and sure, some will choose things that I don't understand and I don't think are important. But that is their life, and them choosing to care about those things doesn't change your life. You are not bound by their preferences.
In fact, I think it is great that all different people have such varied opinions on what is important. I get to observe them all, and see what life would be like under various scenarios. The human existence is so amazing because we all get to lead our own separate little 'experiments' in how we should live our lives (what we should do, what we should care about), and then we can share with each other what we have learned while trying these things. Some of the experiments will be utter failures, and some will be successes. We can learn from them all.
Here are a couple of my favourite songs that I think put it well:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OvMoRVrqx_I
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2z46va
Here's one of my favourite stories about the same thing:
https://www.brainpickings.org/2014/02/25/margaret-mead-meani...
Sometimes it can be fun/stimulating to consider the nature of existence, but if it isn't taking you to that place, why do it? I half remember a story about a famous mathematician who drove himself mad trying to solve a problem regarding infinities, to me this is a great example of the difference between intellect and wisdom. If you're driven to understand something, I'd suggest that tells you something that's interesting in its own right, so to turn it back on you, why do you want to know?
With the example of the mathematician, you can read it a number of different ways, but one of the things I took from it was the difference between a healthy curiosity and an unhealthy curiosity. It sounds to me that you have a healthy curiosity, and enjoy the mental stimulation of exploring the big questions. As long as it remains something you enjoy and you're still open to enjoying other things then you can't really go wrong. If you'd like to find kindred spirits that also enjoy thinking about the big questions, you can find plenty in the world of philosophy. I can recommend The School of Life as an enjoyable way to explore philosophy. As some examples, here are a couple of my favourites from TSoL:
Learning can be done for your own enjoyment, but what I would suggest is the mindset that many of us used to get us through school isn't likely to help with that. I think this video puts it well:
Related to this, here's a discussion about deschooling you may find interesting:
One last thing...
Best of luck!
Whilst I can see that you're looking into nihilism, it's worth knowing that nihilism isn't the only alternative to conventional views and religious dogma. To start this exploration, let's look at reincarnation. My favourite way to look at this is... If you eat an apple, has that apple been reincarnated as a human?
But definitely read Camus and Nietzsche.
Camus is particularly good if you'd like to be exposed to philosophies/ideas that result in happiness, rather than ones that demand you just have it.
I don't think I've personally ever "gotten over" existential angst. I don't think I've ever tried because it's been with me for a while and I somehow came about experiencing it without hitting a deep depression. It's just there. Could have been the sets of fantasy books I read as a child/teenager allowing me to step outside myself mentally, or maybe it's a quirk of my upbringing. I was able to, and still am able to, think about suicide, the meaning of life, and how pointless it all is, while maintaining a relatively normal life.
I often explain to friends and/or family about how my logical/conscious self defaults to existential nihilism and they either go, "Uhhh, ok..." or say, "That's impossible. You care. You can't act the way you do and not care."
They're confused that I chose to live, I guess. So many people bias themselves towards a positive answer of the question: Does life have a meaning?
Many say, "Of course it does. If you really thought otherwise you wouldn't be alive."
For them it's: "Life has meaning... so I must live" "Life has no meaning... so I must die"
I think there's a funny middle:
"Life has no meaning... I... Well, I've got no idea, but I'm sure as hell not going to make a choice with no idea... I guess I'll see how it goes."
But then I remember that I have my moments too. It's not everyday, but I definitely have times where I look at the mundanity of programming. Today, making these pages render in a few milliseconds gets me excited, but the other day I was watching a live feed from the international space station and simply switched the channel. Because what's is the damn point.
I don't find these posts meaningless. And don't be too quick to judge. Today it is him/her, tomorrow it is you!
The fact that I was annoyed was exactly the point. I have my own days where I feel like all I am doing is meaningless, and in those days reading a post like this actually inspires me because I know I'm not alone in this feeling.
Maybe I didn't express myself correctly on the previous comment, but in no way telling you to shut up. Just saying that today you are the one feeling like this. Tomorrow, it will be me.
It keeps coming back to "what's the point of what I'm doing?" and I've personally yet to find any sort of answer that speaks to any sort of higher truth than "I'm here, now what?"
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ecclesiastes+1-...
So basically, I upvoted because I identify with what you wrote.