The implication is that the nanny state has to step in because the poor don't exercise personal responsibility as diligently as the non-poor. Sad.
The implication is that the nanny state has to step in because the poor don't exercise personal responsibility as diligently as the non-poor. Sad.
I've also heard people bitch about seeing SNAP-card holders shop at Whole Foods, so I guess both choices are wrong.
I wouldn't be surprised if most of the difference cited by this study was due to walking. I know that I've had to exert extra effort living in SF to be more active than I had to when I lived in NYC.
I wonder if there will be a follow-up study looking into the actual reasons why life expectancy is higher in NYC.
Wow I find this kinda surprising. I walk more or less as much in sf as in NY, if only because roughly 100% of the time, the weather is comfortable enough to enjoy walking in (as opposed to Manhattan in the summer.... Or the winter).
Then again, I think my house is unusually well connected to transit, so maybe where you live transit+walking isn't as feasible an option.