YayText: A text styling tool for Facebook, Twitter, etc.
yaytext.com
yaytext.com
̲̞̫̾̈́͑́H̜̆͢Ě͕͔̫̹̖͇̇͊̚ ̨̮̍̆̋̑ͧČͥ͌̽̾̚Ō̪̠̟̙̟͌͑̊͡M͙͇̙͎͉̏ͨ͊͒̂ͨͅẸ̷̩͕̞͚ͣͤ̉ͣ̓S̠͖̣̞̽ͩ́ͦ̔̏̚!͖͇̯̙̙̘̥ͥ̎̋͊
But I don't really know much about it, and I'm suspicious of said instinct. HN what are your thoughts -- what are some controversial ideas around Unicode, and would there have been any simpler alternative that could make sense?
I don't think this "hack" points to Unicode doing too much.
For questionable technical design decisions, look at UTF16, surrogate pairs, etc.
e.g.
ℝ denotes the set of real numbers, whilst R denotes the gas constant. 𝐑 would by convention be the name of some matrix.
ln is the natural logarithm, 𝑙𝑛 is the product of 𝑙 and 𝑛. (Only a monster would actually write ln 𝑙𝑛, though.)
I don't know why the consortium chose to include these glyphs rather than push it out to markup languages, though.
There is always what we had before: ASCII + Codepages, 128 standard fixed chars and 128 "extended" chars dependent on the selected Codepage. We could've just agreed on a control character to use as an escape for switching codepage and called it done. That wouldn't have given us such robust support for diacritics however.
▲
▲▲on a side note, attempted triforce is attempted