When you want to cast someone in technology as an antagonist up front with prejudice you use the epithet "tech bro" (or, tech sis, some day). The article made some good points but the exhausting insistence on using the overwrought tech bro takes away from some insight.
Two people, a homeless person and a person of means. Both people, both can be equally mean but we insist the person of means is more "civilized" and thus we implicitly demand more from them while simultaneously demanding less from those who have achieved less. Take those two people and imagine both going off on incoherent booze induced bigoted rants, who do we "expect to know better". They are both people under "the influence" yet we presume one should be able to be "more human" than the other, to be less grotesque.