Excerpt From: Don DeLillo. “White Noise.” (published in 1985!)
Excerpt From: Don DeLillo. “White Noise.” (published in 1985!)
I like feeling liberated from socially "important" photographs such as touristy spots. I never placed that much value on them if at all.
It is a real disappointing experience
And it occurs to me: that situation was self-selected for those people. See, some folks are not really capable of the perception effort required to really look at something. To experience it fully. But they can buy a camera.
Just go somewhere else. They apparently travelled through wonderful countryside to get there - just stop! Barns are not rare, and many are made on the same plan.
Those labels are metaphors for an experience you may not be aware of. He's not talking about something measurable, but ethereal. It's akin to an artistic feeling. You can feel it through certain meditations and awareness practices.
Claiming to know what it is is contrary to knowing it, because it transcends labels, but I will claim that there is a "something" to be experienced that can be referred to as "aural" or "energetic". It is the essence of something that is both inclusory of itself and its context. It grows beyond the thing itself.
Seek and you may find it's more actual than our linear logic, and that it shows once and for all the absolute nudity of our emperor Logicae.
It is for experience alone.
It's just a quite standard poetic / descriptive use of the word, in fact the term "aura" is used in its most common literal meaning -- those photographs of "the most photographed barn in the world" maintain its myth and it's allure. That's what he means with "auras" there.
>And it occurs to me: that situation was self-selected for those people. See, some folks are not really capable of the perception effort required to really look at something. To experience it fully. But they can buy a camera.
The idea behind the passage what that those "some folks" are increasing, or even the majority.
It's not about there not still being other people who can appreciate the things they see.
The author gets paid, the publisher gets paid, you get the copy you want with less resource waste than scanning it for yourself.
Anyone have a moral objection to that they'd care to elucidate.
By torrenting a work you own in a different format, you are (potentially) also distributing that work to someone who doesn't already own a copy.