Hacker News Reader

Comment by js8 | Hacker News Reader

Then we will agree that we disagree.

Let's ignore, for the moment, the big issue here, which is that by far, these jobs are not held only by people who you describe (college students and impaired).

I don't think creating an artificial job that cannot actually feed you can make anybody feel better of themselves. In any case, it shouldn't be called "a job", which was my point.

In particular, I think college students should study and not be distracted by having side jobs, and disabled people should either enjoy their pension (assuming they live in a civilized country that has that) or have a regular job (in fact, labor laws in my country prescribe positive discrimination for disabled people, even though it is probably economically inefficient).

View on HN

Because you don't care about those people who would really benefit from an easy job for 1-2 years which gives them a foot in. Horrible values on display.

/s/horrible/different/

I do care for those people, but I subscribe to a different cultural model. To provide job training so that economy could function should be responsibility of the employer, or the government, and it should be considered a full time job. Regardless whether the "foot in the door" job is supposed to be a job training or not, then I think the employer is perfectly capable of paying minimum wage for people doing it.

Job training by employers doesn't work great, because the worker can get training at an employer that gives training and then switch to one who pays more because that employer doesn't have to do training.

Though possibly that could be fixed with proper regulation.

I would like to see a real flexible job market. (hire and fire misses the point). Companies want employees they don't have to train. I can't blame them for that but right now you have to decide your career path very early on and it's very difficult to switch. At the current pace of the economy it's not reasonable to expect from someone to work at the same job or industry their entire life.

> At the current pace of the economy it's not reasonable to expect from someone to work at the same job or industry their entire life.

I disagree, I think it's a wrong path, because it devalues really deep expertise. It seems to me that people do not want to be experts anymore, precisely for this reason. Dabbling in many different things is seen as a path to success. But I think this culture is missing out on something.

By the way, good social security or basic income can be seen as insurance to switch jobs without too much risk, too.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com