Mark Zuckerberg × H&M
markforhm.com
markforhm.com
Is this....for real? I mean...I guess it kinda makes sense?
looks at date
sigh
500 Internal Server Error
nginx/1.0.5
Edit: I think this confirms my thinking: https://www.nginx.com/blog/nginx-1-6-1-7-released/
For me preferably with no visible brands and organic cotton, although whether that should be just another option or vital to the branding of the supplier is open for discussion.
I'm auctioning this for charity: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250
All proceeds will go to Greenpeace (for their "Detox Fashion" campaign) and Clean Clothes Campaign More info: * http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/detox/f... * http://www.cleanclothes.org/
Because I already own too much stuff - I'm an average person and like anybody else: About half of the items in my wardrobe never get worn. I'm concerned about labour conditions and the environment - if people buy less new stuff, both will be better off.
Please see details, bid on and spread the news for: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250
To me this feels like a lesser version of what would have been a Uniqlo Steve Jobs turtleneck.
If it was for charity... a maybe, but really? On another note, I've found betabrand to be interesting for this kind of wear although slightly overpriced, though not as bad as this post.
Literally, you could buy seven shirt that looks like that for $5 each
Pants you could get for $20
In total if this is more expensive than $55 I hope the profit would go to philanthropy. Especially if they're throwing that word around.
Background: I've send H&M an enthusiastic email, because I'm concerned about labour conditions and the environment. If people buy less, both will be off better.
So, here's your chance - please see details, bid on and spread the news for: http://www.ebay.de/itm/-/301916911250