[0] http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/what-its-like-to-get-...
[1] https://events.ccc.de/congress/2010/Fahrplan/speakers/3156.e...
‘John Doe’ Who Fought FBI Spying Freed From Gag Order After 6 Years
I mean honestly what's so difficult about "Congress shall make no law"? We're not talking about someone yelling "fire" in a theater. NSLs are facts, the searches they authorize are facts, and the gag is also a fact. And it's also not like this even remotely resembles treason or sedition.
I mean honestly what's so difficult about "Congress
shall make no law"?
The exceptions are numerous: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exce...Disagree with the restriction on free speech on its actual merits, not by saying "there's very few restrictions on free speech" when in fact this is not the case.
The idea that a National Security Letter can serve as a secret warrant against a 21st century Charles Schenck like Edward Snowden is interesting.
Neither falsely claimed there's a fire; they are/were men speaking out against war and unconstitutional acts. Anti-war speech should be especially protected.
Publishing a NSL is a defensive act against an immoral and oppressive government. The idea that they are using the NSLs to suppress freedom of speech and fight advocates of freedom of speech should only embolden the opposition.
Then the corporate lawyer talks to the CTO, and tells them that for legal reasons they must shut down their livestreaming stuff.
[1] http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/275-42/19860-us-vs-l...
Treason is _minimum_ 5 years, capital punishment at worst.
This isn't exactly the kind of thing US law treats as a minor offence, especially if it involves computers. Get the right prosecutor involved and this is a national security concern, an act of treason and a cybercrime all at once.
You can be a hero without being an idiot.