Dots are allowed in the package name, so there's nothing stopping someone from having a package named "com.sandra.stickman", if they are really inclined to do that.
You're missing the point. Being intentionally obtuse adds nothing.
That's why it's best not to force people to namespace with backwards website addresses.
If I was being obtuse then it was unintentional. It was a real suggestion. If people really want reverse TLD names then they should do it, and if the community likes it, it will catch on. FYI there are already some package names out there with ".com" on the end.