Hacker News Reader

Comment by kenshi | Hacker News Reader

So thats two pretty major bugs in iOS9.3 (the failing upgrade process for older hardware is the other big issue - and Apple are getting lots of support calls about it).

I really have to wonder what has happened to Apple's Quality Control. More money, more bugs?

View on HN

Check out this patch:

https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=268394&action=diff

[iOS] Revert overflow:hidden on the body affecting viewport scale (r186786)

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152803

Reviewed by NOBODY (OOPS!).

Bug was reported on 6th January, broke thousands of websites, was patched shortly thereafter - and deployed 3 months later.

Three months to fix a major regression snafu. Apple Safari support sucks.

This is just reverting a change that was found to be bad. Returning to a known good state makes sense.

Not sure I understand your point. That bad state got into the 9.2 release, was reverted and three months later got into 9.3. In the meantime thousands of sites break, and the Apple support forums are bursting at the seams with people asking about this issue.

It's hardly "just reverting a change that was found to be bad". The impact was huge!

This was reviewed properly, you just have to click the actual commit: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/194667 "Reviewed by Tim Horton."

The response time here might not be great, but the patch author and reviewer are both experts in this area. I wouldn't consider this patch evidence of declining software quality--it's just a simple bug.

You seem a bit confused. I'm not saying the revert of the patch wasn't reviewed. I'm saying the commit that caused the issue wasn't reviewed.

Hope this helps.

This is the commit that caused the bug: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/186786

Notice the review line

Damn, you're right and I've made myself look foolish. I apologise for my tone and reaction.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com