Strong Link Found Between Dementia and Common Anticholinergic Drugs (2015)
dddmag.com
dddmag.com
The article states that Loratadine is recommended as an alternative for the relief of allergies. The article didn't explicitly mention Cetirizine but I have done some research and came across another article from 2012 which does include Cetirizine in the same category as Loratadine:
http://www.pharmacytimes.com/publications/issue/2012/april20...
I believe I am safe to continue using Cetirizine and thought some of you may have the same question. I am not an expert on these issues so if I'm mis-understood any of this please let me know.
The OP article says:
> Those with allergies can take a second-generation antihistamine like loratadine (Claritin)
But perhaps Cetrizine is more safe, and we should not be taking Loratadine if we can avoid it. Thoughts, anybody?
Guess I'll just have to start eating a bunch of honey...
[1] http://www.agingbraincare.org/uploads/products/ACB_scale_-_l...?
But is there a "safe minimum frequency"? Generally, I try to avoid taking any medication more/longer than necessary, and my bottle of diphenhydramine is still mostly full after many years...
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/medical_exa...
(and ditto the other comment saying the honey thing is bogus - i eat a lot of local honey because it's tasty, but it makes no impact on my seasonal allergies.)
Over the counter sleep medicines lose their effectiveness when taken regularly, so it people are less likely to do so (vs. taking such medicines for allergy relief).
Also NyQuil contains doxylamine [1], which is an anticholinergic, and is listed with the other problematic medicines [2].
[1] https://www.google.com/search?q=nyquil%20active%20ingredient... [2] http://www.agingbraincare.org/uploads/products/ACB_scale_-_l...
Let us not forget that this class of drugs (which includes diphenhydramine (Benadryl), scopolamine, and datura is called "deliriant".
From Wikipedia: " The term was introduced by David F. Duncan and Robert S. Gold to distinguish these drugs from psychedelics and dissociatives, such as LSD and ketamine respectively, due to their primary effect of causing delirium, as opposed to the more lucid states produced by other hallucinogens (psychedelics and dissociatives)... The delirium produced is characterized by stupor, confusion, confabulation, and regression to "phantom" behaviors such as disrobing and plucking.[2] Other commonly reported behaviors include holding full conversations with imagined people, finishing a complex, multi-stage action (such as getting dressed) and then suddenly discovering one had not even begun yet, and being unable to recognize one's own reflection in a mirror."
This is the expected behavior for someone who consumes about 500-700mg of diphenhydramine at once (the dose suggested on the package is usually 50mg). Benadryl is probably the most powerful hallucinogen known; it distorts the senses far more than even some of the most notorious illegal drugs and the reasons for its continued over-the-counter legality might make for an interesting book. Obviously it has healthy uses, and many deliriants have long-established religious uses in North America. The Serpent and the Rainbow and Passage of Darkness: The Ethnobiology of the Haitian Zombie are two books that explain how anticholinergic drugs are what create real-life zombies.
It's more likely the professor either talked about NyQuil in a follow-up question where the direct quote did not flow nicely, or expounded on it in much longer length than the author wanted to quote directly.
I have known people that simply increased the dose.
http://main.poliquingroup.com/ArticlesMultimedia/Articles/Ar...
Personally, I only supplement 4 nutrients and it has been a tremendous sleep quality improvement.
Vitamin D3 in the AM Taurine & Magnesium Glycinate prior to sleep. L-Theanine is also added depending on whether I took caffeine during the day.
For my wife who also has sleep problems, she takes Ambien, but Ambien + Taurine will knock her out, while she can still wake up on Ambien alone.
> #1: Eat More Protein During the Day & Select Carbs at Night
> ... eating a meal of carbohydrates in the evening can help you go to sleep quickly.
This is curious. I've run across this advice before. I have also found, from repeated experiments, that eating starchy foods just before bed makes it harder for me to go to sleep. Maybe I have some weird body chemistry ....
Link: http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=20917...
Either way, something to consider.
[1] http://www.nhs.uk/news/2015/01January/Pages/media-dementia-s...
The process of scientific discussion (that you "don't trust") is just how science works.
I suspect what you actually dislike is the way these papers are cross-reported. It's one thing to be featured in a relevant journal, it's another to be syndicated as "THE CURE FOR DEMENTIA" by a much higher-level journal (or heavens forbid, a newspaper... or worse).
You can blame the sponsors and drug companies for that. Neither of which really seem to be involved here.
The invisibility of the data upon which papers rely is one of the key weaknesses of science as currently practiced, as it makes verification of analysis impossible. I don't think it has to be "how science works", and in fact I hope that science moves away from such opacity to requiring data to be published alongside papers.
You're right though. Of what worth is a paper without data, without code, without all the relevant resources. It's nothing but an appeal to authority.
It's turtles all the way down, in some ways, but I don't disagree with you – code and data are a critical first step and they enable both the verification of findings and better chances at accurately testing the verifiability of the research. It's much better to go out and get your own data and compare apples to apples with the same analytic process (assuming you agree with the analytic process which you should assess even before collecting data, but I digress...)
http://www.virginiageriatrics.org/consult/medications/medsLi...
Note: I am not a doctor, and this is not medical advice.
Of course, Claritin does nothing to help a stuffy nose. It's the wrong class of medicine. True pseudoephedrine (from behind the counter) is the go to for increasing drainage. The new stuff (OTC with phenylephrine) only works as well as a placebo.
That's going to depend on the person, at least as a nasal spray, for me at least it has a noticeable effect that I'm certain isn't placebo. Back when I took it, systemic oral pseudoephedrine (Sudafed) was noticeably better (stopped that route due to it exacerbating my anxiety).
Fortunately, there are nasal steroid sprays, and 2 of them are now OTC, and you can get a prescription for the azelastine antihistamine nasal spray (Astelin, Astepro), the latter ought to pose little risk to your brain. A combination of the two, with occasional very short courses of nasal spray phenylephrine (4 hour) or oxymetazoline (12 hour) curbed my rate of getting sinus infections from more than 1 a year to one every few years.
Fortunately, it's still easy to get in the UK, and doesn't exacerbate my anxiety.
I never tried that, in fact I'm pretty sure I stuck to the 30 mg immediate dosing version, which was useful but not quite a "miracle drug", then again I'm sure our sinuses are quite different. So I haven't really missed it, between the effect on anxiety, and much later living in a notorious area for meth, where my usual pharmacy is in a city where even dispensing of OTC versions requires a doctor's prescription.
If my doctors really wants to clear my sinuses while treating for an infection, they use a Medrol DosePak (serious steroid with a lot up front and then it quickly tapers), something my father is all to familiar with due to his poison ivy allergy and ability to get into the stuff.
It's two of the 60mg "Sudafed Decongestant" (UK Branding) tablets, which I don't believe are sustained release (typical/listed dose is 60mg - I confirmed with my GP that 120mg is fine FOR ME [do NOT take this as general advice] if taken infrequently). I generally only need a single dose during the day for my sinuses to stay clear enough to be manageable (and sinus infections are infrequent anyway), so the large upfront dose works for me and is well under the daily recommended maximum (240mg).
Loratadine and Benadryl are antihistamines, pseudoephedrine is a stimulant that has a decongestant affect.
There's Claritin branded combo pills that have Loratadine and a decongestant, but "Claritin" in normal conversation should probably be reserved for the one active ingredient Loratadine pills.
Back in the eighties in Seattle I would take a Benadryl every morning, because I was allergic to just about everything (I was poke tested). Eventually I downgraded to chlor-trimaton. So I guess I'm potentially doomed.
Here in Denver I rarely have allergy issues.
My mention of doom is because I got the impression that the rise in risk (10%) was associated pretty hard with long term use, which I had, and distant past wasn't mentioned as a mitigation.
Maybe try the other 2nd generation drugs next time you feel the need (Allegra is yet another compound)?
So that people have to take time off from work and pay for a doctor visit to get allergy relief?
No thanks.
Might as well require a prescription for beer, then.
"Another implication of the ability of cholinergic antagonists to promote dementing diseases is that sufficient choline needs to be provided so that adequate PC production can continue. This might most effectively be done by administering the choline as a component of a nutrient mixture that contains all three of the PC precursors which limit PC’s rate of synthesis: uridine as its monophosphate; DHA or EPA; and choline [24]. This mixture has been shown to diminish Aβ formation in experimental animals [32], and could have the added benefit of partially restoring the deficient brain synapses."
Alarming stuff! I've no problem giving up Benydryl, but my partner takes Disiprimine,and it's the only drug she's found that works well for her depression :-(
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alzheimer%27s_disease#Choliner...
[1] http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=20917...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921468/
The suggested mechanism is that coal tar derived medicines trigger a self sustaining inflammation reaction which causes generation and accumulation of amyloid plaques.
More worrying to me is the fact that OTC antiemetic (motion sickness) drugs like Gravol/Dramamine/Vomex/Dramina are made of dimenhydrinate, which is 50% diphenhydramine, which in turn is what the mentioned 'first generation' antihistamines are made of.
> What is Tylenol PM (acetaminophen and diphenhydramine)? Acetaminophen is a pain reliever and a fever reducer. Diphenhydramine is an antihistamine that reduces the natural chemical histamine in the body.
It's explicitly the anticholinergic diphenhydramine that's being looked at in things like Tylenol PM. Standard paracetamol isn't being questioned, I don't think.
Find out the mechanism of action.
1) If the allergy medicine is "anticholinergic" -- same mechanism of action but not the same drug -- then it may or may not have the same side effects.
2) If it is "diphenhydramine" then it likely does have the same side effects (even if different delivery).
3) If it is a different mechanism of action then it likely will not have the same side effect.
If 1 monitor the research, if 3 you probably don't need to worry at all. If 2: talk to your doctor about alternatives. Keep in mind this is just a single study and new evidence may overturn current evidence. But the side significance and magnitude of the effect I would say is cause for concern (again just one study I expect there will be many more).
Dose dependency was mentioned, and I'm presuming/hoping taking it by inhaler results in a relatively low dose to the brain....
http://www.agingbraincare.org/uploads/products/ACB_scale_-_l...?
Article claims a 10% increase in the risk compared to those who have not taken the medication. Do not misread that as a 10% risk of developing dementia. So if for example there is an 5% chance of developing dementia in your lifetime, the enhanced risk is now 5.5%
The study says the effect was dose dependent, so with any luck your brain wasn't getting all that much....
Since there's no ethical way to do a prospective study, this is more suggestive than anything else. They admit they don't know the mechanism yet, so take with a grain of salt.
I have already seen several casual confounds in other comments like this and I have to think the scientist went to stringent lengths to eliminate as many confounds and variables given how strong they claim the link is.
> They admit they don't know the mechanism yet, so take with a grain of salt.
Just because they don't know the mechanism doesn't mean it should not be taken seriously. We barely confident of the mechanism that causes Tobacco/Nicotine to give cancer. Some even argue it isn't even Nicotine but rather the bacteria that is around nicotine that produces carcinogens. And there is a good chance like Nicotine products the cause is probably multifaceted (like coupled vehicles etc.).
That being said I haven't read the study in detail.
Having worked in academic science, I can assure you, every scientist tries to make their findings sound strong.
> Just because they don't know the mechanism doesn't mean it should not be taken seriously.
True. There are many things for which we get good evidence before knowing the mechanisms. But here, I'm not sure the evidence is that good, which is why I think a suggested mechanism of action would go a long way.
"Antagonism of muscarinic, histaminergic, and adrenergic receptors has been hypothesized to be associated with various anticholinergic, sedative, and cardiovascular side effects of other psychotropic drugs."
1) First, required reading for anyone interpreting medical studies: http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?.articleid=201218 TLDR; is that ~40% of _randomized_ (generally considered highest level of quality) studies and maybe more are proven wrong by subsequent ones resulting from publication bias. Consider that this would not have been published in a high profile journal if it showed no effect, hence pub bias. In other words, we're not seeing the similarly large analyses that show no effect because they're not published.
2) The adjusted analyses have confidence intervals on the odds ratio that overlap with 1.0 except for the highest dose group. There is evidence of a dose response relationship, but there is a problem in how they measure dose response. Cumulative dose biases towards people who have been on medications for a long time. People who are able to take medications (ie are older) for a long time are at greater risk for dementia.
3) It is problematic that they assume any effect on their endpoint is a class effect (ie true of all anticholinergics). The relationship with one medication may be driving this effect entirely. I would like to see, for example, oxybutynin pulled out of the analysis which is never prescribed for allergies and more often for neurological conditions, which could be an unmeasured confounder depending on how they modeled the comorbidities.
4) Controlled analyses are difficult to do well. Most of the time it controls for linear effects, meaning synergistic effects (which are probably involved in development of dementia) are not captured unless explicitly modeled. I do not see that they did this here.
5) I am further suspicious of the way they obtained fill data. As you are noting, many OTC anticholinergics are not "dispensed" in a way typical of prescription anti-cholinergics. If I bought Benadryl at CVS or even if I bought the pre-packaged bottle at the Group Health pharmacy, it's pretty clear to me that neither of these would be reflected in the data. This skews heavily toward prescription anti-cholinergics, which tend to be given for psych/neuro indications which themselves have an association (though likely not a causal one) with dementia. Again, unclear if they modeled all of these.
Overall, I share the sentiment that medical literature needs to be more open. I think it's unfortunate that current state makes it hard to confirm analyses like these with a great degree of certainty.
"Three years of taking either daily Benadryl, Advil PM, Tylenol PM, or Motrin PM, for example, is associated with about a ten percentage point increase in the probability of experiencing dementia or Alzheimer's compared to no use."
I've used it occasionally for bee stings and the like, I would rather suffer through hay fever than take Benadryl every day.
I don't know if this is a common experience or not, but it's not unheard of.
I have lost all trust in modern medicine. It doesn't mean I don't use it, but I avoid it and find alternatives whenever I can.
They have 0 incentive to look for long term consequences of the use of their products.
The conclusion would be the same: Be very wary of having yourself put on any form of long-term medication.
FDA regulation doesn't encourage manufacturers to look at long term effects.
EDIT: I'm wrong about this. Thanks hga.
In granting the initial approval. There's various stuff to watch for bad long term effects, which it must be noted also take a long time to show, and are also known to be tied to uniquely vulnerable sub-populations who won't necessarily be well represented in clinical trials.
Heck, for some time I took a drug what almost certainly would have never gotten approval if anyone had realized it killed the livers of a small number of people taking it, when the total number was large enough. The FDA black boxed it and the original company stopped manufacturing it, but many like me who'd passed the danger period and had no signs of liver problems continued taking a generic version for a while.
And how many drugs have been pulled off the market after additional testing hasn't been completed?
See GFK_of_xmaspast's link to the FDA page on Vioxx, where the drug company's monitoring effort pulled the plug before anything else.
I thought that they had been the instigators in vioxx, but not quite: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInfo...
Because what you ask is just as stupid
Let's hope you don't find out about dihydrogen monoxide then