What Is a Robot?
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
I'd argue that most dishwashers and washing machines are not robots, because they follow a pre-set sequence rather than responding interactively to their environment. Some might have a degree of closed loop control (eg. temperature control, automatic load size selection) but nothing that you would really count as perceiving their environment.
As for what we will call a robot, the trend seems more the opposite. Twenty years ago an autonomous car would absolutely have been called a robot, whereas now we carefully avoid the word when referring to anything but a robot arm.
I think what we (as a society) call a robot is a machine that has some degree of versatility: - an industrial robot can be programmed to achieve a different task (even if the sequence is pre-set, it is easy to set a different sequence for a different need), and the same kind of robots can be used to achieve many different tasks - a food processor can make many different recipes - a Roomba can adapt its behavior to the room (it has some degree of versatility because it can adapt to the conditions)
... but a dishwasher has a single purpose, which is why we usually do not call it a robot (even if it has sensors, actuators, some algorithms, etc.). If the dishwasher was also capable of cooking dishes, it would be more versatile and we would call this a robot (think of a humanoid torso that could do the dishes but also cook your eggs).
And the most versatile robots like a fully-featured humanoid is probably what we all have in mind when talk about robots.
Overall, we could say that we have degrees of versatility and therefore degrees of 'roboticity'. The lower level is the dishwasher, the highest level is the humanoid.
Really, the definition of a robot is pretty vague, and usually along the lines of 'a machine capable of carrying out a complex series of actions automatically'. Or maybe not.
If Čapek had been an English speaker, he would arguably have called his androids "workers".