The Violent Remaking of Appalachia
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
We shouldn't call Appalachia "coal country": these are mediocre economic numbers. The landscape and health of Appalachia is worth more than that, never mind the grotesque global issues burning coal generates. With renewables basically at cost parity (even neglecting massive externalities), there is no economic, environmental or moral reason to oppose just shutting the whole damn industry down.
Thing is, there's nothing in the southern half of the state to replace $70K/year jobs. Nothing. I understand why the few remaining residents are hoping for a miracle.
There's so much to be gained by just, stopping what's going on. Enough surplus benefit to take care of, if not the communities at least the people. And if we all drop the magical thinking, it's plainly doable.
I'm sorry about your uncle, in so many ways.
No mention of terrible problems created by the alternatives: Fukushima, Deepwater Horizon, and Oklahoma's sudden jump in seismic activity.
One could write the same article for any energy source.