This would have been news worthy 10 years ago.
Today, it's more like shrug who cares.
Dependency on IDA, closed source, limited platform support, Java/Swing ...
Far better free solutions out there.
Today, it's more like shrug who cares.
Dependency on IDA, closed source, limited platform support, Java/Swing ...
Far better free solutions out there.
http://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/2347/w...
(It's worth noting the answer from Igor Skochinsky, while not the selected answer, comes from IDA's author.)
- BinDiff would work stand-alone if someone wrote an exporter for another disassembler (BinDiff uses https://github.com/google/binexport for that).
- Closed source - yeah it contains some secret sauce and also depends on a commercial graph library (yFiles). Not easily replaced. Their product is also pretty good.
- Limited platform support - well, there is an older OS X version as well and we have this on our radar for future releases.
- Far better free solutions - please do show. Maybe we can do a diff-off some time :)
YOLO :P