Why is it "not have 56k for operating expenses"? Something that can be had for $2k is not something a healthy business spends $56k on. You should be able to find a better use for those $650k that year.
I just thought that moving that much data would cost some serious money. Apparently that's not really moving "that much data".
Wrong assumptions on my part :/
I still didn't make my own "clone", because I can't afford machines to start selling it.
AWS has a lot of 'free' services, which still have to be paid for. Some of those free services are things that benefit both the client and AWS, but would be avoided by many if folks had to pay for them (like IAM credentialling)