Hacker News Reader

Comment by dommer | Hacker News Reader

The list has little value in isolation. A brief context about why a particular film is in the list would be much more helpful. The audience can then understand why he included "controversial" directors like Gibson.

The list on its own is just a list of films to watch that someone enjoyed...and everyone would most likely have a different list.

View on HN

The list wasn't created in isolation it's for his grad students, that's the context.

I'm not sure I said the list was created in isolation. The list if most valuable when taking with the film school lectures. Without the lectures I cannot be expected to understand why Spike add a particular file into the list. Therefore they are a list of films to watch recommended by a notable directory; of which there are many such lists.

As someone that has watched many of the films on the list recently I can tell you that there are many that haven't aged well IMHO.

Perhaps that's in part why they're listed?

I'd counter that if you watch the films on this list and don't understand why Lee included them, you're not likely to be a good film director.

But this is a list for aspiring directors - If I'm currently aspiring to be a better director, then some level of explanation would be beneficial to me

Not really. If these movies don't stimulate your directorial imagination, a few words aren't going to help.

It's a list for aspiring directors who are part of the NYU Graduate Film program http://tisch.nyu.edu/grad-film/courses ... and they get three years of context.

You could ask for context from any university reading list... http://www.kings.cam.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/offerholders/... ...they're of passing interest to people looking to be 'well read', but are provided mainly for the students, and the context is the course.

I think that was my point. As a reader of this list, it is of passing interest. Take the course this list accompanies and I will receive much better context and substantially improve my understanding of their inclusion.

Well, no. You stated it was list of films someone enjoyed.

But that's not what it is. It's a list that one of the top living film directors on the planet thinks that directing students at one of the leading film schools in the world should watch.

That's a different thing entirely.

Each one of these films has things directors can learn from by just watching them. Film being a visual medium and all.

Sure, some lectures can provide context, but the movies themselves are the actual content.

Fair point. I'm sure he did enjoy them as well as their content being of notable worth.

I very much doubt the list, and the act of watching them is the whole lesson Spike is trying to impart. The lecture series would complete the educational message.

You could say that. But the message—arguably—would be much better received with information.

Better received by who? For film students, the films themselves are the information needed.

The interruption of art is deceptive with nuance and esoteric means. Simply reading Shakespeare doesn't provide someone with understand of the proposed wisdom behind the text.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com