I will concede that explicit is better then implicit, but I seized the opportunity to clear up a historical inaccuracy in the process.
I will concede that explicit is better then implicit, but I seized the opportunity to clear up a historical inaccuracy in the process.
No-one is being dishonest. No-one in this thread claimed Parks was the first. You're attacking a strawman.
> You don't grasp at straws and tell people they can be Rosa Parks if they do what you say.
Um what? Doesn't the history - the fact that Parks' act wasn't spontaneous but was in fact planned and organized - exactly align with that?
And believe me: I'm all about not invoking easy references to drum up BS patriotism, but if that's your point, then say it like I just did.
I might also add that you yourself would probably benefit by putting something on the line before you make a career out of siezing on opportunities to clear up historical inaccuracies. Unless I somehow stumbled upon talking to Malala Yousafzi.