Big-name sites hit by rash of malicious ads spreading crypto ransomware
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Funny how Ars doesn't mention the fact that using a good ad blocker would also be immensely helpful. In fact, it almost sounds like they're saying NOT to run an ad blocker, since it is a third party extension.
At the end of the day, if the companies relying on advertising don't even know who they're getting their ads from, why should I let them risk MY IDENTITY for their profit?
I get that I'm visiting their site and they're producing the content that I was there for (in some cases), but if I have to worry about every single link I may follow then I'm going to take steps to protect myself. When I encounter a company that is acting ethically (like StackOverflow, off the top of my head) I make sure they get added to the whitelist.
I can't rely on disabling JS if I also want to enjoy using the 'net, so I do the best thing that I have available, kill the third party ad network requests.