This doesn't seem like a paradox to me. Rather it seems kind of obvious. If the statistics are anything like a random walk then random walk theory (usually revisiting the starting point) would predict this.
This doesn't seem like a paradox to me. Rather it seems kind of obvious. If the statistics are anything like a random walk then random walk theory (usually revisiting the starting point) would predict this.
The OP's post is an outstanding exposition of James-Stein estimators though, so thanks for the post. There seems to be lots of connection between these and doing linear regressions with regularisation in machine learning.
But maybe it's more than that. The will power to overcome our intrinsic limits eventually runs out. We can only focus on the ball so long before our thoughts wander. And at some point below the average of our capabilities, we get tired of taking a break and start to perform again as well as we know we can.