> no one ever
Except [at least] me.
I like man better because it's consistent. Some tools want --help, -help, -h, -H, -\? etc.
I like man better because I can search it.
I like man better because it gives me the details, not just a list.
Except [at least] me.
I like man better because it's consistent. Some tools want --help, -help, -h, -H, -\? etc.
I like man better because I can search it.
I like man better because it gives me the details, not just a list.
Plus even if grep matched something you can't read the context without extra options.
man is much easier than doing all that, but the time you have your full search command you would have already gotten your info from man.
For context try grep -2, where 2 is the desired lines of context.
$ wget --help |& grep -2 base
-i, --input-file=FILE download URLs found in local or external FILE
-F, --force-html treat input file as HTML
-B, --base=URL resolves HTML input-file links (-i -F)
relative to URL
--config=FILE specify config file to use
--
existing files (overwriting them)
-c, --continue resume getting a partially-downloaded file
--start-pos=OFFSET start downloading from zero-based position OFFSET
--progress=TYPE select progress gauge type
--show-progress display the progress bar in any verbosity mode
(Not that I'm arguing that this is an excuse for wget's [and GNU projects' in general] man pages sucking, but it's a useful workaround.)But rather, doing all that seems easier than man to you?