Child tracker firm in hack row

"What we do know right now is that the alleged data breach affected about 0.5% ... "

They know that it affected some of their customers, but still call it "the alleged breach"?

One must be careful who they work for. Remember the State of Oregon v. Randal Schwartz case [1]?

Report your security concerns and then get sued for hacking...

[1] http://www.lightlink.com/spacenka/fors/

> "With respect to customer data, no financial information or unencrypted password credentials were vulnerable."

sigh.

In that case, I'll tell them that they were DoSing me when they visited my website, because I didn't "authorize" them to access it.