This brings up an important point: there are lots of people out there who are rejecting technological augmentation of human intelligence in favor of the older ways like rote memorization and reading the manual. It's like people who want to study a map first rather than just depending on getting real time directions with GPS while driving. Or reading deeply from primary sources about history rather than crowd sourcing questions to historians.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out, but I suspect that like the Luddites and their looms, augmented human intelligence via computers will win out in the end. People will simply find it more efficient to tackle learning from a agile perspective using search and crowd sourcing to grab what you need when you need it rather than doing a lot more reading up front and later sifting through what they need and don't need (YAGNI for knowledge?).