Why Tim Cook Is Wrong

theregister.co.uk

4 pointstempodox2 comments

Unfortunately this writer does not understand the boot loader security on iOS. Since Apple's signing key is burned into the device, Apple is the only one who can modify its functionality by loading new firmware. Even in that case, the only firmware that can be modified without unlocking the device is the lowest level boot loader, which likely has numerous size and functionality limitations, as all the device features probably are not enabled. I would not deem this a flaw in device design. If Apple creates a signed piece of software that allows for a brute force exploit, it is creating a backdoor for the FBI.

https://www.apple.com/business/docs/iOS_Security_Guide.pdf

Does apple have firmware lock that requires user input/password for signed firmware/software updates?

If it has and it can be circumvented, there is fault somewhere. If it don't have it, Apple should have it.

>What is actually being asked for here is that Apple write custom code that allows the FBI to perform a brute-force attack against the iPhone without triggering the "10 strikes and the phone is wiped" protection mechanism. This is a completely different animal.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com