Red Hat ships kernel with crash bug, hides fix behind paywall
bugs.centos.org
bugs.centos.org
Edit: I have 10 systems on this kernel and all of them are working.
Disclaimer: worked at Red Hat more than a decade ago.
Interest: I have an affected system, and discovered the crash when I upgraded to CentOS 7-1511. Until this gets fixed, I'm stuck on the last working kernel, though I could use the mainline kernel from ELRepo. Otherwise, it's "hello, Ubuntu Server."
If it's in the kernel doesn't it have to be GPLv2? So only one person has to buy it, and they can share it with CentOS. Does CentOS have a special deal with RedHat that they won't do this?
That's a tricky question. As far I know Red Hat provides all the sources for their free software (that's the reason why CentOS can exist), but the binary things are a tricky question.
I think you could share your recipe (the source code), but retain the sauce (the configuration and compiler that produces the binary and the binary itself) and still comply GPL, it's a grey area.
Why CentOS wont share the Red Hat binaries? Well you won't want to bite the hand that feed you.
> z-stream is 'Extended Update Support (EUS)' - errata kernels (and select other packages, as required) are maintained for an older Update (Point Release) after a newer Update comes out.
See [PDF] http://www.sistina.com/f/pdf/rhel/LIFECYCLE_EUS_Datasheet_22...