SCO ORDER Granting IBM'S Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [pdf]

I have a daughter born is 2003 who is in Middle School now. It is crazy to me that this is still going on, especially considering the weakness of new-SCO's claims.

EDIT: I also really like the fact that the 2004 "Utah Unfair Competition" law (Yarro's Law) cannot be applied retroactively.

If only AT&T had come out with true System V/386 a few years earlier, SCO never would have gained traction.

"This order addresses SCO’s unfair competition claim, granting summary judgment on that claim in favor of IBM."

I see this is a new document. I miss Pamela and her interesting point of view though.

SCO? The undead walk the Earth!

Was I the only one to check the date at the top?