Code management that doesn't suck

The headline is somewhat insulting, because I don't think my current code management system sucks.....different strokes for different folks, I guess.

The product being marketed is a replacement for Gerrit, though. They have found a different way to handle code reviews, merges, and also added features like issue trackers and integrations with other tools. It might be worth taking a look at, but I tend to prefer free (as in speech) tools over proprietary tools.

Some of the English is sounds a bit quirky to me ... "Pull Requests like never seen before"?

Interesting nonetheless as we've been looking for software similar to Gerrit.

I love the features of GitColony. At GitLab we had many similar requests. We already implemented multiple reviewers, rebasing, marking something as a work in progress. But many of their other features are also very useful. And the good news is GitLab support is coming soon.

The pricing is a little weird here. As the team size grows, it gets more expensive per head at every pricing level. Usually, it's the opposite.

This looks interesting. Does it give you the ability to setup rules so, say, X amount of reviewers must approve a PR before it could get merged? Also what about protecting, say, master from direct pushes? Github seems stagnant and I know Gitlab is rapidly working on many of these types of features; it would be cool to see better support for reviews in general in any of these systems.

So how does the workflow work, if you're already using Github and want to keep hosting your projects there? Does it simply pull and push commits via an app token?

I don't see "distributed" anywhere on the product page. That makes it DOA for me, but nice effort