LinkedIn Tumbles 30% on Earnings Guidance
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
I also think I just accidentally downvoted you (damned mobile UI/UX failure), for which I apologise.
Google+ started, at least, with a rather strong professional cachet. Its inaugural user cohort trended very strongly to Googlers, Xooglers, their immediate contacts, techies, and a number of folk with aligned interests.
And, unfortunately, SEO and marketing types. A very nearly fatal disease in a content-sharing community.
Google had a number of tremendous mis-steps. Privacy and confidentiality were very large among them, and I've little confidence that Vic Gundotra's G+ of 2012 could have executed on a professional-networking G+ successfully.
I think that with many of the very, very hard lessons Google's experienced, and I very sincerely hope has learned from, it could today.
Google could offer a G+ professional network which, at the very least, would benefit Google itself as a recruiting device. Possibly paired with other activities (women in STEM outreach, summer of code), and platforms (something Github-esque).
Google offering a general interest recruiting platform is probably a non-starter, in that it's a direct conflict of interest (Google would want the best candidates for itself), and in light of the illegal anti-poaching collusion case (still ongoing IIUC). Pity.
Google also don't need to directly monetise G+, an could avoid many of LinkedIn's more obnoxious practices.
Interestingly, there are people posting on Google+ that make for the occasional, decent content. Far more, certainly, than the awful "inspirational" memes I see so often on my LinkedIn feed.
Indeed, the internal argument was that Google was blind to all the data within Facebook, and thus FB would be in a stronger long term position to sell targeted ads. LinkedIn, in contrast, is already Google indexed. It'd be difficult to bootstrap their company without exposure, since it's a double sided social network.
Heh- my instagram feed is clogged up with inspirational memes. Interestingly, they're posted the most by the least successful people.
Linkedin skeeved me out and I stopped using it after they started spamming me constantly to add all these random people I barely know to my professional network, like a dude I sold a couch to on craigslist in 2007. No thanks, Linkedin. No thanks.
Actually curious - I've never had any interactions through the site other than randos endorsing me for things I know nothing about, and code-sausage-machine consultants and recruiters sending me emails about positions that don't match anything in my profile. But it must have somebody out there that uses it, if they're pulling in 3.6 billion in revenue.
I work in tech.
As someone else mentioned, I update it when I'm looking for a job. That kicks off a bunch of messages and invites from recruiters.
There's the usual hits and misses, but it works fine for me.
Now imagine you're a buyer for a large furniture retailer, if you have your profile open, it might not be unusual for a supplier looking to get into somewhere bigger to contact you.
I've worked with a few sales guys, what they tend to do is use linkedin to build a tactical map. They then strategically expand their network until they get close to who they want.
LinkedIn, when used correctly probably won't come in the form of an inMail, but in the form of a phone call out of the blue from an acquaintance.
It's funny you mention that because I feel like in the last year or so LinkedIn recruiters have caught on a bit. I've received far less solicitations than years past (at one point I was getting 5-10 per day). In fact I rarely ever get LinkedIn spam these days. Instead I'm seeing more spam from Dribbble and AngleList.
Also good for finding well respected people in my field, figuring out from that which companies are doing good work there, and keeping tabs on the companies so that I have a clue what the more global picture is outside of my immediate circles.
I do not work in programming though.
That seems surprising to me, all things considered I actually believe LNKD is a company with real value - TWTR seems far more shaky.
And there's the odd funny joke too -- once I got a job offer for building a supermarket on the south coast. You know, I'm a 'software architect' after all, got to know how to build supermarkets...
(well I did participate in projects that looked a lot like oil refineries, to be fair ;-))
Did the CFO hit some "dive dive dive!" switch to loosen the filters and avoid the torpedoes?
I don't know how Linkedin finds these people that I purposely spent the last decade trying to forget, and why they are so insistent that I connect professionally with them all.