Hacker News Reader

Comment by melted | Hacker News Reader

This ignores mountains of evidence that shows realtime, synchronous communication makes you less productive due to reducing (or eliminating) your ability to focus.

View on HN

Do you have any sources? Not trying to be a dick but this sounds interesting.

As an anecdote, this has definitely been my experience. And it's compounded by having numerous different media: phone, text, GroupMe, Slack, email, Facebook, Hangouts, and so on. At this point, there's not a single service anybody can use to immediately reach me, because I've pretty much conditioned myself not to read anything until I feel ready to be distracted. It's a mess.

There are some interesting links in this recent Economist article: http://www.economist.com/news/business/21688872-fashion-maki...

Example quote: "... interruptions, even short ones, increase the total time required to complete a task by a significant amount."

Including a book I'm going to check out, "Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World"

It seems to be built primarily around asynchronous communication, not synchronous.

It's only asynchronous is you have willpower, which is finite and easily exhausted, and if there's no expectation of realtime response on the other end, which there nearly always is these days. Whoever comes out with a viable system that is explicitly async (like mailman, or a good secretary) will really benefit humanity.

It's like normal Facebook, which I don't think even the biggest of addicts treat as a synchronous system. The entire structure of the application is for you to post and consume updates at different times.

You're going to have a hard time convincing me that Facebook is synchronous when the entire power of News Feed (and what makes Facebook so much more powerful than Facebook) is its ability to keep you updated without requiring constant real-time attention.

It does not require constant attention, but in fact it is addictng for users and people do sit and refresh their feeds for extended periods of time, watch the live activity stream on the side, or engage in chat, etc. Facebook wants you to spend a lot of time on Facebook and optimizes for this. They do not expect people to quickly check the site and leave and I would suggest most people don't do that. Or they they do, but they do it so repeatedly (continuous partial attention) it's even worse.

Edit: I would just add that in an environment where every site action has some kind of real time notification tied to it, the async nature/expectation is greatly diminished. Especially in a work context. And so now you have to add 'good job!' and water cooler type notifications to that cognitive overhead too.

Check out TMail21 ("Power Threads for Teams". It is explicitly designed as an asynchronous communication platform. Furthermore, it is being integrated into all of the chat services like Slack, Hipchat etc. to avoid balkanization between chat and asynchronous communication.

I actively block Facebook at work with /etc/hosts and I would continue to do so if my workplace installed this.

And so do I, along with Reddit and a few other sites. Should probably add HN to the list as well.

two recommendations:

- Momentum for Google Chrome fixes the 'new tab' page so that it shows you what you want to focus on today rather than what you frequently get distracted by. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/momentum/laookkfkn...

- SelfControl for OSX blocks sites for a specified period of time. https://selfcontrolapp.com/

Whoa, a Chrome extension that doesn't require a permission to read everything everywhere. That's something I haven't seen before.

I would recommend RescueTime so you can see exactly where your time goes and how much time you spend on certain websites, etc.

I’ve used RescueTime and Freedom at work before joining Facebook, and Facebook at Work when I worked there, and you can filter between the work and the personal services quite effectively with a basic filter.

Facebook at Work actually allows for longer-term communication that are still fairly dynamic and contextual. There is a chatting system (Messenger) but most of the interactions happen through threaded comments in groups.

Absolutely. The biggest offenders which are: people talking on the phone or talking directly to other people when there are other tools for the job or even worse, synchronously engaging several people at the same time (meetings)

this is targeted towards people who like open-office ;)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com