No offense meant but why not get the app?
I understand not wanting an application for a news website or something like that but something you use often like google calendar it would seem like the application would be better than the mobile page.
I understand not wanting an application for a news website or something like that but something you use often like google calendar it would seem like the application would be better than the mobile page.
If they want to show full-page ads and be super annoying, then fine, I'll deal with it. But don't pretend to be against it when you do the same practice yourself.
Showing that they rank above "timeanddate.com" doesn't mean a lot.
> Our analysis shows that it is not a good search experience and can be frustrating for users because they are expecting to see the content of the Web page.
https://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2015/09/mobile-f...
This would imply that they know the experience is bad for users, they know that the penalty won't hurt their ranking, and so they will continue to show the bad experience regardless? That's just as bad as them not penalizing themselves for the full page ad.
I assume different departments run calendar and search.
It really just shows the sad state of mobile advertising when they're showing you ads for an app you already have.
However, if I'm on a specific app publisher's website, I wouldn't mind letting them know (through some mechanism) that I've already installed their specific app.
How do you expecet them to know all the apps installed on your phone? And if they DID know this information, people would be up in arms about privacy or lack there-of.
I don't expect them to know all the apps installed on my phone, nor do I think they need that much information to solve this particular problem.
This is missing from the android app. So you have to browse to the calendar on the web and ... this.