In my experience that happens very rarely. If the board votes at all, and especially if in a direction that the CEO doesn't want to go, then it's usually a vote to dismiss the CEO.
But the people you surround yourself with (and their incentives) do matter. "Control" is a lot more subtle and social than you might expect.
In that sense, we are saying the same thing. I agree that "control" does not require voting by the board. I do assert that investors with board seats exert far more control that those without, and investors with higher equity positions exert more control than those with less. I also assert that an equity stake of 1.5% exerts very little control. Again, YC exerts _influence_ (call it control if you want) simply because of their reputation for being good at what they do, but 1.5% ownership barely changes that equation.