A while later he met with the headmaster and asked him why Page's picture wasn't featured in the lobby? He never got a direct answer but apparently they didn't feel that merely making a lot of money was enough of an accomplishment ;<).
A while later he met with the headmaster and asked him why Page's picture wasn't featured in the lobby? He never got a direct answer but apparently they didn't feel that merely making a lot of money was enough of an accomplishment ;<).
Bill Gates gets a bad tech rap too, even though he was coding successful compilers himself for several years.
[1] http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9223678...
Here is a video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o4MwTvtyrUQ, of everyday people trying to explain what a browser is, a browser, the most important piece of (general use) software developed since the word processor or spreadsheet.
Try asking the general public what PageRank is, much less who invented it, and be prepared for a montage of silent deer-in-headlights responses with the occasional stammering about librarians for good measure :)
If not, they have heard of google. I am not sure if this guys was just ultra hipster, bitter about not getting a donation, or he literally doesn't realize that google was an inportant contribution.
Either way, society seems to disagree.
I'm not sure who deserves the credit for figuring out the meaning of the stationary distribution of a markov chain (that it exists follows from the Perron Frobenious theorem and may have been known before that), and I don't know who first applied it to references/hyperlinks - but it wasn't Larry and Sergey