Introducing TrumpScript – Make Python Great Again
makepythongreatagain.org
makepythongreatagain.org
Ugly is better than beautiful.
Explicit language is best.
Simplistic is better than simple.
Having complexes is better than being complicated.
Flat world is better than complex world.
Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules, bitches!
Dissidents should never pass silently, unless explicitly silenced.
In the face of ambiguity, fall back to prejudices.
There should be one-- and only one --way to do it: Mine.
Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Donald Trump.
SyntaxError: not a chance
Would be extremely funny if he have no chance at the nomination.
I tend to believe this has merit since you can position yourself a certain way and gain a lot of popularity with certain segments of the Republican party/conservatives, but distance yourself from the rest of the party. The fact that this group has largely identified itself as the Tea Party and has been around for several election cycles and Mitt Romney, the most moderate of the of 2012 candidates ran away with the nomination in 2012, speaks well to this hypothesis.
Some observations:
An innovative new statement construction can be used to make objects immutable on-the-fly. These statements - called insults must be prefixed by a statement of the "I have tremendous respect for <object reference>, but " construction. Following the insult statement, the object will be immutable for a while.
TrumpScript is really bad at interacting with other languages. But why would you?
TrumpScript is more form than function. In fact, it is extremely diffucult to phrase anything concrete using TrumpScript. Unlike other languages, lofty concepts can be expressed even contrary to popular facts.
TrumpScript is neither imperative nor declarative - a language first! While it may look imperative, statements are not in any way affected by previous statements. Indeed previous statements can (and frequently do) contradict later statements. The innovative internal perception engine makes this possible!
It would make great boilerplate. and maybe one could put in a variable and two, and try to look at the outcomes in what that man really is saying, numerically.
+probably has some value in traffic, if executed properly.
If you want to write a funny esoteric language, ask yourself whether the first example program is seriously funny. If it isn't, put it back in the bin.