This entire article should have stopped after this quote: "Consensus means no ownership. What’s important is not that everyone agrees, but that everyone is heard and then the right person makes a decision."

The rest just reads like typical, big company bullshit non-content. But the first few paragraphs? I agree with that a whole lot. After being in many, many, many meetings where multiple people "own" something and it's almost impossible to get anything done. But one owner? Even if you don't entirely agree with the direction it's at least crystal clear.