Interesting opinion on the subject: http://themodernteam.com/flat-will-kill-you-eventually-why-e...
http://www.wired.com/2014/03/tyranny-flatness/
Critics say flat organizations can conceal power
structures and shield individuals from accountability.
This idea dates to the 1972 essay The Tyranny of
Structurelessness by Jo Freeman, who describes her
experiences in “leaderless” feminist organizations in the
1960s. “There is no such thing as a structureless group,”
Freeman wrote. “Any group of people of whatever nature
that comes together for any length of time for any purpose
will inevitably structure itself in some fashion.”
The problem with supposedly non-hierarchical groups, she
wrote, is that power structures are invisible–and
therefore unaccountable. That inevitably leads to
disfunction and abuse. Charismatic leaders could use their
position to advance their own agenda, award desirable
tasks and projects to an “in group,” and shift blame for
mistakes.
and more on Valve's flatness in practice, http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-07/09/valve-managem... Charismatic leaders could use their
position to advance their own agenda, award desirable
tasks and projects to an “in group,” and shift blame for
mistakes.
And how exactly does that differ from formal hierarchies?