Why Yahoo Should Say Yes To Microsoft | Hacker News Reader

Why Yahoo Should Say Yes To Microsoft

blogmaverick.com

I perhaps one of the exceptions on hackernews (at least seems that way), to think that this perhaps is a good alternative for yahoo. The other possiblity is that yahoo could go on being independent for anouther 3-5 years and be continually dominated by Google.

Listening to Jerry Yang CES keynote was hardly optmistic, and if I was a shareholder watching that i'd have been disappointed. Google is going from $300,$400,$500,$600, to even $700/share. And prior to Microsoft annoucement, YHOO shares fallen back to a price they were trading at 4 years ago.

Not only that, you consider over the years, Yahoo has had more then good opportunities to buyout big companies when they were small like Google and Ebay, and the recent future Facebook (which is small but could very well become big one day).

This is obviously not a match made in heaven with Microsoft and Yahoo. But there are clearly facts here. If you think Yahoo is only temporarily at low point in their history and sooner or later they'll bounce back, then Microsoft should not pass off the opportunity to buy them now. If you think their at a low point, and they could possible go lower, then God damn, they should looking for mergers rather than choosing to die a slow an painlful death at the hands of Google.

Lets for a moment(if possible) stop thinking like mere coders and pretend as least to think like astute businessmen.

Mark Cuban is a heck of a bright guy, but he's wrong on this one. Just do a gut check after reading his opening paragraph:

"One thing about Jerry Yang that I always have admired is that he cares. He cares about his employees. He cares about his products. He cares about his shareholders. Most of all he cares about building a world class company that can be great at what it does."

And the solution to building a great company is to allow it to be swallowed by Microsoft, most likely losing its best employees and its brand in the process?

Sorry, no.

(The deal might be the best option for shareholders, but when you talk about building a Great Company, you should be thinking of more than just money imho)

He is thinking of more than just money, and in his argument, that's exactly why Yahoo should sell. Then they could focus on building great products rather than bending to the will of Wall Street.

Because their options vest and they can leave with a bunch of cash to do startups with, if the deal happens? "Microsoft" is not a brand I associate with "focus on building great products". I guess that's a bit of a cheap shot, and at one point in time, they certainly outcompeted everyone else to win what would go on to become their monopoly, but still, I just don't see anyone focusing much on anything with two big icebergs crashing into one another, let alone 'great products' free from political interference.

Because MS is one of the few companies willing to ignore Wall Street to work on long term viability.

Did you guys even read the article, or is this just knee-jerk anti-Microsoft sentiment.

If they're so into long term, how come they're so late to the game in terms of internet stuff? There's a difference between "don't have as many people breathing down their necks as everyone else does", and the actual corporate culture at Microsoft. The first thing could be a very positive thing, the second is not a point in their favor from everything I see.

I think the vision of Microsoft as this white knight that will come along and gently put some breath into Yahoo's sails is to ignore the nuts and bolts reality of how Microsoft has approached this sort of thing in the past. I could always be wrong, and they've learned their lessons, but only time will tell, and I wouldn't bet on it.

They're certainly not agile, nor are they perfect. No question about that. But they do have a long history of ignoring Wall Street while working on building long term profitability. The Xbox360 and the Zune are good recent examples. Though the Zune has yet to materialize as a major profit source, and honestly may never, they're definitely going against the wishes of investors to try to become more of a player in the consumer space.

My personal feelings aside as to whether or not MS/Yahoo is a good idea, Cuban is right in that it will allow Yahoo to focus on the long term in a way that remaining independent (if that's even an option, which it probably isn't) will not.

There's definitely some logic in that, but my gut feeling is that all the 'hullabaloo' surrounding the merger would supersede that effect. Hirings, firings, integrations, strategies, turf wars, technology conflicts, etc... will not be an easy thing to keep under control and out of everyone's way in order to let them concentrate clearly on the future. If they manage to, then what you're saying will come into effect.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com