Graal.js: High-Performance JavaScript on the JVM by Christian Wirth
youtube.com
youtube.com
It states:
License Rights We grant You a revocable, nonexclusive, nontransferable, royalty-free and limited right to (a) use one (1) copy of the binary portions of the Programs and any Supplemental Programs for the sole purpose of internal non-production and non-commercial evaluation and testing of the Programs, including, developing no more than a single prototype of each of Your applications; and (b) if provided by Us at our sole discretion, view the source code portions of the Programs internally for the purposes of evaluation and testing only (collectively, “Authorized Use”).
All rights not expressly granted above are hereby reserved. If You want to use the Oracle Technology for any purpose other than as permitted under this agreement, including but not limited to distribution of the Oracle Technology or the application You develop or any use of the Oracle Technology or the application You develop for Your internal business purposes (other than the Authorized Use), You must obtain a valid Oracle license permitting such use.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/licenses/early-adopter-lic...
How could someone with any dev experience think this is reasonable, let alone enforceable?
It reads like:
"We need free beta testers and early adopters to depend on our software. Later we'll charge exorbitant licensing fees when it's put into production or sue them out of existence."
Considering the Google/Java court battles. I wouldn't touch anything made by Oracle with a 20 foot pole.