Steven F on the iPad: Old vs New World
stevenf.tumblr.com
stevenf.tumblr.com
I may stand alone on this issue, but I see this the exact opposite. In an automatic, being able to drive along with just a foot on the gas and hand on the wheel, I find that I actually pay less attention to driving and more attention to everything else: other cars, the radio, my passengers talking, billboards, buildings, etc. In a manual, I'm infinitely more aware of what my car is doing and what I'm doing to mesh that hunk of metal and plastic with the rest of traffic, and far less focused on all of life's distractions.
The iPad does everything that my parents currently do on their computer without the annoyances of a PC. If you look at my parents desktop it is covered with miscellaneous files. They don't care how anything is stored. They only want to do simple tasks and have everything work.
The more I think about it, the more that I realise that the current user experience on a computer is not pleasant. Especially for my parents who don't want to have to worry about defragging and keeping virus protection up to date. This is where the iPad will excel. As Steve says "it just works".
However the locked down aspect of the apple system and the potential for a monopoly is worrying so I'm hopeful that that Android and Chrome OS will fit into this New World market.
As for the elderly loading their iPhones with apps - my experience is that people do that with "old school" computers too. Only then it does break their computers.
So basically we're looking at a product that will function well instead of breaking when a typical user uses it in a typical fashion? Surely that's a good thing?
It's certainly a good thing if people can not load the computers with spyware anymore. But there is a price, so it can not be universally said that it is worth it.
The bad thing about the keyboard/mouse/screen workstation is that it is designed to efficiently soak up all of your attention, and the overhead of entering/leaving the active use mode makes this an all-absorbing proposition.
That is a big disadvantage of the workstation interface, versus the iPad, a Kindle, the morning Newspaper. Those can soak up your attention, but you can also set them down pretty quickly to get up and open the door. The mode switch isn't such a large overhead. So these interfaces blend in more harmoniously with everyday life.
But for programming, a workstation is great! In fact, for any activity requiring extended, deep concentration, a workstation is a very good proposition. For programming? I think it's pretty fantastic.
We have cars today that might as well have the hood welded shut, or at least with a lock open-able only by the garage. But we also have cars like the Ariel Atom, that are so focused on function, that they even lack body panels. We still have car modders and hippie enclaves with 3 Mercedes Diesel 240DLs in a garage shed out back.
Hacking is not going away.
The fact that the keyboard is a bit of an afterthought is telling. Yes, you can create presentations, spreadsheets, emails and documents, but there's no denying that it's awkward in a way that reading a book or surfing the web on the thing is not.
It's a bit like when the Walkman was introduced without a record function. It didn't spell the end of tape recorders, but it recognized that people spend vastly more time consuming music than producing it.
I think the fact that it's locked down the way that it is is orthogonal to the consumption versus production question. It's as though this Walkman will only play studio-mastered tapes. Which is why I'm rooting for some credible competition to come along and force the issue.
I think Apple's current approach favors benefit to apple rather than developers or end-users.
Sometimes Apple's interests line up with those of the user, but often they don't. I hope it hurts their sales and benefits more open platforms (probably Android) - that may be because I'm from the old world.
I like the dreams embodied by the Lisp machines and by OLPC. The idea that every part of the system can be easily inspected and manipulated resonates strongly with me. The freedom to tinker with a device can and does lead to new and amazing things the original creators never imagined. College kids playing with iPads will never invent Multifinder, and that's sad.
Essentially he's repeating what everyone here probably already knows, and connecting that to the iPad. We're the minority, and Apple's audience might start shifting away from a niche, hip gadget-audience to an incredibly mainstream audience.
From over ten years ago I remember making an argument for Free/Open Source software and using the "car with a welded hood" argument. The person just looked at me blankly and said, "I never want to look under the hood of my car. I take it to the garage and let them mess with it!"
The hood of a modern car isn't physically welded shut, but many cars have become so specialized that only a dealer or specialist mechanic can afford the tools to work on them. Any serious tweaking and tuning requires either hacking sensors to lie to the ECU, or a custom, programmable ECU since the factory ECU is a black box.
I want the mainstream to care just a little bit about these things, because if they don't, I won't be able to get products without the hood welded shut. Sure, there will always be specialty hacker-friendly devices, jailbraking and the like, but those are big steps to take for someone just starting to explore. There's no easy gateway drug like discovering the terminal on a Mac.
I think people are conflating Apple's locked-down restrictive policies with the OS design of iPhone and Android which prevent installing a bad app from breaking your device.
You're barking up the wrong tree.
a) It's not a real taxonomy. He's, in effect, making a prediction about the direction that computing is going -- towards prepackaged specific purposes away from general purpose. Think of it as a descriptive concept.
b) Even if it was a taxonomy, most of those are going to fail boundary conditions. Those things aren't mathematical sets. They're useful to talk about populations, and generally fail at boundary conditions. "North America" doesn't really exist because you can't decide if a particular Panamanian boulder is in it or not?
Classic nerd/techy mistake. Now cut it out!
Android is a counterpoint. So is the OLPC OS, for that matter. You can have an open, general purpose computer that's also turnkey in operation.
So there are other ways than requiring the hardware manufacturer to vet safe software at the expense of the rebels and tinkerers.