I have five digital ‘personal assistants’ and still can’t get anything done
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
But quickly I stopped using it for these reasons:
1) I had to get ready to let go to much private data
2) I hate talking to a thing and it makes me look ridiculous both in public and in private (the social awkwardness might improve though in time, humans can get used to anything :) ).
3) It impacts the smartphone battery life
4) As stated in the article, it's never perfect so a single frustration in the experience makes it basically useless compared to accomplishing the task the old way. I'm obsessed with productivity.
5) Voice commands are perfectly suited in cars but I don't own any.
6) What about the impact on memory and cognitive skills, it probably won't help improving them.
I might not be the target customer, I can't even see myself using a real world assistant.
The answer to this in scifi is a subvocal microphone. Unfortunately, the real-world equivalents [1] haven't progressed beyond the experimental stages yet.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_consumer_brain%E...
You do. I do too. But trust me, the next generation wont. Speaking in front of a microphone, being recorded, or uploading videos for public consumption is completely natural for the 'Generation Smartphone'
This is the beginning of Google's voice assistant being worth the trouble to me as a user.
Hopefully they'll point this recognition AI in more directions. Seems like it should be easier since it's already text.
Actually, what I've found under the hood is that each expects to be used in a particular way, and when used the other way, isn't as good at it.
Sort of like the expression that you belong to your cat, the assistant trains you.
> Which is what makes the assistant from x.ai so interesting. All it does is schedule things: you copy it on emails where you're trying to set up meetings, and it sends reasonably cheerful emails to your other participants to find a mutually agreeable time. Mortensen sees his own company's assistant, Amy Ingram (AI, get it?), as a vertical agent: she takes care of one task well, rather than trying to be an all-in-one.
> Amy Ingram
Like Nathan Ingram from Person of Interest, the co-creator of the AI that is a sorta-protagonist in the show?
I believe the field has generally accepted "strong AI", or artificial general intelligence as being something impossible to achieve.
As far as a "real" assistant goes, it can be easy to find one if you live in a city with craigslist. You can find someone to hire hourly once in a while, or bring them on full/part time with a salary if you have the means. The payment range is minimum wage up to whatever you want to pay. Whether you want something official where you run payroll, provide health insurance and everything, or just pay someone under the table - there's pretty much going to be a long list of people who will want you to hire them. I've taken out ads before and gotten over 200 responses (Chicago area). When you become directly responsible for other people's financial livelihood it can really change how you think about employment and life in general.
"Long lists don't get done" https://books.google.com/books?id=U77um_h_dgcC&pg=PA125&lpg=...
All these personal assistants, from the Pilot, to MS Outlook, to the latest smart phone, have the same problem: they don't actually help you get anything done.
You have to have the work flows and discipline to process your "inbox," schedule your calendar, prioritize your work, and DO it.
I know Franklin-Covey and Getting Things Done are still popular, but where are the new tools for THAT?
If there was a add-on that counted every day your inbox was at zero and gave you a meaningless brag, it would have a similar effect to me. There's nothing like getting a tiny useless award to ensure that I do what I should be doing anyway.
Senior execs certainly get real value from long-term admins but that's a different equation.
[EDIT: Of course, to the degree the assistant can find a venue for an event etc., that's something else entirely. But I'm not sure the degree to which the typical virtual assistant can be trusted to do that.]
I also work from home. So I don't care about the following: driving directions, traffic, weather, sports, appointments (I have very few). Texts also difficult because half are in French, half English (I live in Montreal).
"Remind me tomorrow at 11am to go to the dentist".
The reminders app is kind of a piece of shit interface wise. So Siri works really well. I also like "directions to home". I wish I could say "Share my location with Mom for 1 hour" but I can't and that's stupid.
My biggest Siri complaint is it's one and done. You can't modify commands and have to start over. Which is super frustrating if it gets a text almost entirely correctly but misses one word.
Any other useful shortcuts people like?
All these 'assistants' that we use, they relieve us from having to remember these things ourselves. But does it actually relieve us or does it in fact cause us to lose a useful skill?
Many of my friends used to remember numbers and such random data quite well.
There are different kinds of brains. Some of us are fundamentally no good at remembering 'random' data.
Your fundamental point, though, is well taken, though it might be an inevitable byproduct of...progress?
> Socrates: At the Egyptian city of Naucratis, there was a famous old god, whose name was Theuth; the bird which is called the Ibis is sacred to him, and he was the inventor of many arts, such as arithmetic and calculation and geometry and astronomy and draughts and dice, but his great discovery was the use of letters. Now in those days the god Thamus was the king of the whole country of Egypt; and he dwelt in that great city of Upper Egypt which the Hellenes call Egyptian Thebes, and the god himself is called by them Ammon. To him came Theuth and showed his inventions, desiring that the other Egyptians might be allowed to have the benefit of them; he enumerated them, and Thamus enquired about their several uses, and praised some of them and censured others, as he approved or disapproved of them. It would take a long time to repeat all that Thamus said to Theuth in praise or blame of the various arts. But when they came to letters, This, said Theuth, will make the Egyptians wiser and give them better memories; it is a specific both for the memory and for the wit. Thamus replied: O most ingenious Theuth, the parent or inventor of an art is not always the best judge of the utility or inutility of his own inventions to the users of them. And in this instance, you who are the father of letters, from a paternal love of your own children have been led to attribute to them a quality which they cannot have; for this discovery of yours will create forgetfulness in the learners' souls, because they will not use their memories; they will trust to the external written characters and not remember of themselves. The specific which you have discovered is an aid not to memory, but to reminiscence, and you give your disciples not truth, but only the semblance of truth; they will be hearers of many things and will have learned nothing; they will appear to be omniscient and will generally know nothing; they will be tiresome company, having the show of wisdom without the reality.
Would you mind telling the passage number?
I'm not versed in this matter so my question put in simpler terms is one of attempting to see the flip side of the coin. That books and 'letters' have a downside is reasonably well documented, cultures that do not rely on writing for passing their information down from generation to generation are richly populated with people that perform feats of memory casually that astound those that rely on the written word. That the advantage lies with the 'books' faction seems to be a foregone conclusion (this is usually the case when you compare a human that is augmented with some tool against one that is not so that's a bit of an open door to kick in) but it is always important that almost everything comes with some kind of price tag and if you can't see the price tag you might make the wrong decision in some of these cases.
Just like calculators cause us to become (much) worse in mental arithmetic (but we can do much more complex math in a short time even without the required skills).
Thank you for the addendum. Below a couple of interesting viewpoints on the 'augmented human', I had not considered those. Trying hard to imagine a modern society without the written word, and whether or not such a thing would even be possible. Imagine somehow leaping to a technological society without having writing in between, what would that society look like?
http://journal.oraltradition.org/files/articles/1i/6_haveloc...
But basically the idea is that alphabetic literacy creates a whole new style of abstraction and detachment. Before the alphabet there were pictorial glyphs which are still not very abstract, but after the alphabetic revolution in Greece, Havelock traces a new style of philosophy and thinking in general, starting around the time of Plato.
Maybe you could compare it to something like the development of algebraic geometry, which allows you to say all kinds of new things in an abstract way, because you move to a level of abstraction that's not limited to what you can represent diagrammatically.
Oh, it's called the "alphabet effect": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabet_effect
It's at least something to consider when thinking about an alternate history where we didn't use written words. We would probably still have "external memory," but maybe in a more symbolic/pictorial/diagrammatic/geometric way. Perhaps we would even have symbolic algebra and math, taught by oral instruction... It is pretty hard to imagine!
Abram who wrote "The Spell of the Sensuous" has a different argument than Plato. He also critiques writing and the alphabet, not because it ruins memory but because it allows us to retreat from our sensuous embedding in nature, which ultimately helps create a modern world in which we mostly live in a kind of isolation where we are always surrounded by things of human making.
> Today we participate almost exclusively with other humans and with our own human-made technologies. It is a precarious situation, given our age-old reciprocity with the many-voiced landscape. We still need that which is other than ourselves and our own creations. The simple premise of this book is that we are human only in contact, and conviviality, with what is not human.
To try to steer back towards the original conversation... I'm thinking of things like alarm clocks, which are also technological assistants for doing stuff that we used to do ourselves. They also help maintain a kind of abstraction from our surroundings and "natural" premises: they make us independent of sunrise, circadian rhythms, and so on. And maybe they erode a capacity for waking up at the appropriate time without help. Personally I do avoid using them unless I risk missing a flight or something. If I need to wake up early, I prefer to go to bed early enough to give me a reasonable margin. If I tended to oversleep by hours, I'd consider that a symptom of sleep deprivation or something.
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2016/01/a-world-...
Also, the same questions you asked can be used as an argument against books. Or writing, as the parallel comment quoting Plato shows.
It seems I'm not alone in this, a scene on a terrace in some town I visited was a family of four having dinner together. Only they weren't really together, each of them was absorbed in their own little private conversation with their phone and not a word was said. This isn't all that rare but on that particular occasion I happened to become acutely aware of how we are now more interconnected to those at a distance than to those right in front of us.
The sure knowledge that I'd be just like that is the biggest item on the list of things that stops me from carrying a smart phone with me at all times (that, battery life, durability, and my roughly equal dislike of both Apple and Google).
Joking aside–it's important to remember that some people have really complex lives. Two full time jobs with a couple of kids and you're potentially juggling a lot. That's four different schedules, three you have to be keenly aware of and the fourth you need to keep in mind for certain events or exceptions. Those kids are probably part of a sports program and at least one other extra-curricular activity. Then there's the PTA and various other school activities and events.
There's also people that simply don't have the mental ability to remember things like appointments because they have disorders that prevent them from doing so. Add that family complexity to someone's plate with a disorder and you're looking at a level of chaos you've probably never experienced in your entire life.
I always make that joke about the Mennonites, if an EMP hits someone will have to go there on foot or bicycle to tell them about it and they will wonder what the fuss is all about.
> Joking aside–it's important to remember that some people have really complex lives.
That's a point well made, thank you for that. You are dead on, my life is 'simple' and I very much intend to keep it that way. I'd recognize the need for a personal assistant as a sure indicator that I'm on the wrong track, removing stress from my life is a very important thing to me.
> There's also people that simply don't have the mental ability to remember things like appointments because they have disorders that prevent them from doing so. > Add that family complexity to someone's plate with a disorder and you're looking at a level of chaos you've probably never experienced in your entire life.
Another point well made, thank you again.
I've been thinking lately that simplifying my life is something I need to take on as an overarching philosophy. How much stress I'm under often feels correlated to the amount of complexity I'm dealing with. Thank you for reminding about it and affirming it.
Makes me think of an idea: an x.ai for getting rid of people bugging you in inconvenient moments. You tell it, "Amy, please make X leave me alone" and it tries to parse your conversation, automatically providing things like expected arrival time, traffic conditions and attempting to deflect questions.
Every now and then I wish I had such a tool.
My wife discovered this recently, it's really an amazing way to explore your photos.
Sadly, Google Now doesn't seem to support it yet :(.
You can click on the text to open Messages and edit manually before sending. (Admittedly it's not well documented.)
If I'm listening to music with earbuds, it makes things much easier than signing into my phone, etc.
This is what happens every time I use Siri to dictate more than a sentence too.