Harbingers of failed products
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
The authors of the paper don't attempt to attach an explanation to the results; they just look at its statistical significance for use in making marketing decisions. The effect is only seen in some product categories. If you read more into it than that, you're going beyond what the data says.
[1] https://marketing.wharton.upenn.edu/mktg/assets/File/Anderso...
Maybe the products were just too expensive and those "harbingers" are all just rich people?
Or maybe those people were early adopters who saw potential value in the product, but the product was just too shitty for mainstream consumers?
So if your product fails, just blame the people with low standards who initially bought it!
Example: "If something appeals to them, it’s unlikely that it will appeal to the mainstream." No, it doesn't say that about the general cases -- that's like saying "if a (harbinger) likes Star Wars, it's unlikely that Star Wars will appeal to the mainstream." The only universe of products that is relevant to harbinger behavior is failed products.
Rather youd want to involve them in early early tests of products. If they like it change something quick!