The Rise and Fall of ‘Boring Dystopia,’ an Anti-Facebook Facebook Group
motherboard.vice.com
motherboard.vice.com
This is my biggest beef with all popular social media platforms today. They've invested vast effort in making themselves addictive but almost zero on making them efficient for users at scale.
Take OSS for example - any moderately successful project will start attracting so much noise the project will typically end up consuming all the waking and some of the sleeping hours of the founders, largely through communication and managing a growing team.
IMO this is the stuff we need to figure out how to scale effectively on social platforms instead of investing all out efforts into ever-more-toxic clickbait
But I'm talking empowering social "power users" with more tools to make them more efficient. Googles Gmail auto replies would be a prime example - http://www.wired.com/2015/11/google-is-using-ai-to-create-au...
Toxic clickbait is an investment with a substantial and proven return. What is the revenue model for effectively scaling communities? Users will presumably demand it for free and be averse to advertising.
So is selling arms to third world countries.
> What is the revenue model for effectively scaling communities
Similar to AWS - pay for usage. There are enoug people experiencing pain of running one-to-many relationships with the Internet. Provide them productivity tools. Of course not as sexy for investors wanting a quick return
"' . . .if a society does increase significantly in size, and if at the same time it remains unified and integrated, it must elaborate its organization.' A common reaction to this scale-complexity relationship has been to account for increasing complexity of social organization through population growth."
http://eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/ISCOM/GAJ1-17.pdf
The future successes in social networking will come from people who leverage social science and not just computer science.
Best part.