You were right at the time, but I just flipped through it now (the meat seems to be in attachments 4 and 5 at the bottom of the original link) and it doesn't change my argument.
What service did you render to Square to earn the payment you claim to deserve? Did they get the idea for their product from your patent? Did they learn how to implement their process from patent?
Are you just trying to get a slice of the pie because of some childish "I thought of it first" garbage, and because our broken patent system allows it?
I suspect it's that last one.
> Yet you argue that they're the pro-innovation good guys
I never argued that. I argued that you are trying to extort money out of Square despite providing them with no real service or benefit, and that this does real harm to innovation.