Trim seeks out and destroys awful monthly subscriptions
theverge.com
theverge.com
I've been wanting to use a service like this but here is my question.
Whats with the whole text message as a ui craze?
I don't get it / like it.
Especially for this app. The explanation I usually hear is its good for people who dont have smartphones or at least good ones.
But I think the overlap of the set of people with this problem and no smartphone are vanishingly small.
This is the kind of service I want an app/ website that I can analyze the data with and push notifications work for the text message case.
It's a next gen command line.
Also, everyone largely keeps text message notifications on so it's easier to maintain communication compared to relying on the user enabling app notifications
It's a simple but powerful approach.
~ Former Twilio evangelist, so biased :)
- First, the target would have to be a subscriber to Trim so that's a small group.
- Then you'd have to cancel something they actually have so that further shrinks the group. (Netflix would be a likely candidate.)
- But then Trim could thwart most attacks with a simple "Are you sure? If so, respond with " + rand(0, 100) If Trim used a simple Y/N the attacker could spoof that easily.
Spoofing a message from another number is relatively easy. Catching Trim's responses is more effort and most attackers aren't going to go to that level of effort.
But we've seen Facebook control the connection with your audience on that platform and start forcing you to buy ads if you want to communicate to a large percentage of them. In the same way, apps have matured a bit and those who might have made apps to get the instant notifications have seen users and or Apple control the push notifications more.
Since texting is usually reserved for people we know, having notifications via text means you'll read almost 100% of them, rather than turning them off. Focusing on text is a way of cutting through the noise.
I called Netflix support and was told some excuse their computer had already billed me so their hands were tied.
Somehow with no interaction Netflix was able to sign me up for another account on my credit card not authorized by me. And they didn't seem the least bit worried and we're actually defensive or insulted.
I can't recall the end result but I think I was given a month free or something like that.
The support person was sorry I didn't want to stay with them I said you have no idea how I need up with two accounts! Why would I stay?
Anyway I guess this service wouldn't trim that duplicate account but it shows how easy we can lose control of our money.
Uh, really? Just look at the list of your transactions and that's it.
We all live on the shallow submarine.
Do you really not have 10 minutes per month to review your transaction history?
The service may be free, but(!) you have to hand over your financial info (to a random company) and credentials (to plaid/intuit). Protecting that information is worth a lot more to me than 10 minutes of my time.
Not to mention, reviewing one's monthly transaction one by one is a great opportunity to reflect one's spending habits and rein in superfluous purchases.
I've mostly decided it's not worth it, but every couple months I'll ask "how did we spend this much?!" and categorize everything only to discover it was my new ski gear all along and I'd just forgotten it.
> Do you really not have 10 minutes per month to review your transaction history?
You're asking a loaded question here, with the intent of shaming people into giving dishonest answers.
The correct question to ask is: how many people carefully look through their credit card statements every single month?
My guess is that ~25% will say that they do and ~10% actually would catch inserted mistakes the first month.
To build successful products, you have to design for people as they are, not at as you think they should be in some ideal world where people are smarter, more virtuous, more rigorous, or have more time.
Also, IMO the 2nd part -- easy automatic unsubscription in one place -- is actually even more valuable. A few times I would actually notice a transaction, say I need to cancel this one before next month/quarter rolls over, and then forget about it :)
Not if you have several cards through several servicers. I myself have eight servicers that I'd have to check. I only actively use four of them, though. I'm acutely aware of this complexity and have over time moved most recurring bills to a single card on a single servicer.
There's nothing on the website stating that they're not storing information. (They do list that they don't have access to certain info, such as credentials, but nothing discussing actual transaction data.) I would hope that sort of thing would be explicitly called out. There's also no mention of security audits or anything other than their use of 256-bit encryption for lots of stuff, which frankly I don't know whether is good or bad, enough or nowhere near that. Also, companies of this size go out of business or get acquired or whatever all the time... where's some assurance that my data will be purged when the company dissolves or gets bought out by WeSellYourData.com?
Color me somewhat skeptical.
On a related note, the fact that TheVerge talks about it as though "what an awesome service" without mentioning ANY sort of "oh and by the way they can see ALL YOUR DATA because they're TEXTING IT TO YOU BY GOLLY" makes me think the less of them, as well.
Colour me confused Robin!
You read http://www.asktrim.com/security, did you read the last paragraph where they say you can email them directly at security@asktrim.com, why don't you do that instead of over-reacting in the comments?
It turned out, I had "two digital subscriptions" albeit ONE username and password.
The person kindly informed me this was going on for 3 years and could only refund me a year's worth after I protested how it was possible to have two digital subscriptions with the same Userid.
Just update your legitimate subscriptions with your new card number, keep careful notes, and wait to see who else out there starts squawking.