Italian Mafias killing less but infiltrating more businesses
japantimes.co.jp
japantimes.co.jp
They also are propped up in the prison system in turn for helping the guards establish order in overcrowded units. Guards do set ups to make sure the dominant group always has an upper hand in any conflicts, like 4 associates being "accidentally" put in the same class/program with a rival of another group.
There will always be gangs but they won't have access to millions in capital to fund huge street wars thus less incentive for new recruits to join them.
The prison beating lawsuits are all here http://blogs.vancouversun.com/2015/11/26/violent-attacks-in-...
There's also a well known illegal drugs shack called the "blackdoor" that operates with impunity because before they arrived the streets were a free for all of violence, during the Olympics the police asked them to close so the media wouldn't discover it and embarass them.
Then of course there was all the Quebec mafia corruption probes into illegal city tenders that went nowhere.
So if someone is robbed, it's their own fault?
To answer the question, robbery is violence. I'm talking about securing property against theft, vandalism, etc. "Fault" seems like a moral judgement, which isn't necessary here. To hold someone responsible is to expect responsible behavior from that person.
David Simon describes both this phenomena and how the war on drugs tossed this approach [1].
That said, this hardly eliminates crime or makes it OK. Poverty and the turf wars over facilities for victimless crimes are always going to spur violent crime.
[1] https://www.themarshallproject.org/2015/04/29/david-simon-on...
Your entire post is filled with speculation verging on crackpot conspiracy theory.
It sort of mirrors the way governments have gotten more advanced with repressive and tyrannical techniques. Unsophisticated governments will whack people or arrest them and throw them in bottomless pit prisons, etc. Sophisticated totalitarian regimes use nudge theory and very advanced astroturf type propaganda, and when they have to 'whack' someone they discredit them and assassinate their character and credibility rather than martyring them with a physical attack. Much cleaner, more efficient, and in the end far more effective.
Maybe, maybe not - a lot of those groups operate via intimidation, and there's nothing like a gruesome murder to underline that.
The line is of course somewhere between "maximum intimidation" and "might annoy enough people to have the police actually do something" I guess.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kelly_%28weapons_expert%...
So this is nothing new except to the writer apparently.
If I recall correctly (and I may not, because this is probably colored by some History Channel conspiracy documentaries), there were contingency plans where Sicily would secede to allow NATO to retain a foothold in the Mediterranean, with the CIA relying on Cosa Nostra connections with the Sicillian mafia in order to effect this...
Yep, I must have been watching that in between a special on the Mayan calendar, and one on how Stonehenge is a pre-historic alien spaceport...
So, I think it's so simplistic to picture mafia as gangsters robbing and extorting businesses and dealing drugs. I rather picture them as shirt-and-tie business men traveling to Milan, Munich, London, Luxemburg and Geneve looking for investing opportunities.
So where does the "organized crime" kick in?
Really, Italy is a young and complex countries with regional differences that are almost ununderstandable to foreign people. There are many "mafias", more or less violent, more or less connected with the economic and political powers, it's not simple and it's not dicothomic, there is a very big grey area.
Mafia should only be able to thrive in underground activites like predatory loans, drugs and such.