That last line of reply was worth reading the whole article for.
That last line of reply was worth reading the whole article for.
I, for one, give them a hell of a lot of credit for pushing back at Jason in this way. He's the one who brought up the subject, and it's fun to see people stand up for themselves. It's part of why Jason is such an entertaining writer himself. He's a big boy; he can take it.
Seriously, I've been fighting with these guys for a decade trying to get them to address the fact that their data is wrong and HIGHLY DAMAGING for startups looking to get ad revenue.
They ignored me for a decade, and this email was the FIRST time I've really been able to get them to address the issue.
I try to take these inside conversations and put them in the sunlight and part of that is writing with a certain, well, flair (at least 20 pieces of flair in fact).
You can be sure I'm laughing and smiling when I write these things, and more so when folks like Comscore or Kiretsu Forum take the bait.
Now that Comscore has engaged the debate other folks can move it forward. I think Comscore will do the right thing here and move to a freemium model like:
1. Free for companies with under 50M impressions 2. $1,000 a year for companies with 50m-250m impressions 3. $5,000 a year for companies over 250M impressions
If they did this they would build a funnel of clients and a ton of good will. Compare that plan to their current plan:
1. Pay us $5,000 for accurate stats or... 2. Don't pay us and we will use our old and admittedly inaccurate system for counting your stats--thus damaging your company and ability to get advertising.
best j
(Lastly, you've been around here long enough to know not to sign your comments/posts. If you're going to add extra stuff to the bottom, add some of that sweet, sweet LA sunshine.)