Faber boss says future of book publishing is mobile
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
You cannot always successfully transpose the content from a physical book to a smaller electronic device, at least not without re-designing the layout of the book.
Plain text books, such as fiction, are the most easily adaptable to smaller electonic displays. But many other books require a redesign to make them suitable for reading electronically. For example, the simple act of scanning a two-page spread with your eyes is difficult or impossible to do on mobile devices (and not very comfortable if done on a big monitor compared to holding a book or magazine in your hand).
So E-books will evolve, but physical books have a long shelf life ahead of them.
There's actually a fairly wide size range of devices that are ereaders or have ereader software.
Either way, I hope that phones do not become the preferred way to read books, I really like my e-reader, if only the technology seemed a little more modern (Its hardly changed in 5+ years) I think they would have no problem becoming more popular.
ebooks are easier to store, easier to back up, and easier to access where and when you want than paper books, and can support functions (search, etc.) that paper books don't. There's a good case that -- outside of the downsides of DRM for those books that are burden by it -- ebooks are just plain better than paper books in many ways. So its not really unreasonable that they'd be more expensive (books generally don't have direct substitutes, and the ebook and physical version of the same book don't come from competing entities, so the tendency for a perfectly competitive market to drive prices down to production costs is mitigated -- OTOH, the forces driving prices up to marginal utility are present just fine.)
I love my Kindle 3G Keyboard and I really hope e-readers stay around too. But I've noticed I've been using my Galaxy Tablet a lot more for reading lately, even with its lousy 160ppi resolution.