AKATSUKI preparing for orbital insertion around Venus
global.jaxa.jp
global.jaxa.jp
The Akatsuki story is particularly interesting for two
reasons. First, because the failure was documented in
exceptional detail, with telemetry from the propulsion and
attitude control system available to reconstruct, like the
“black box” on an airliner, the events leading up to the
anomaly. JAXA is to be commended on its openness: in the
challenges of space we can all learn from others, and some
western agencies are not always as forthcoming with
technical details of anomalies. And second, because the
Akatsuki story may yet have a happy ending.
http://www.planetary.org/blogs/guest-blogs/2015/1204-akatsuk...Mars is just a cold crappy desert.
* Acid atmosphere and extreme winds
* No easy surface access -> No on-site resource extraction
* No magnetic field -> more radiation
* Larger delta-V requirement for a round trip
* We have no launch systems built for a launch while suspendend in the atmosphere
* Low water content
* Much less signs that suggest previous habitability (hence Mars is more interesting)
* Suface access can be done by robots, resource extraction can happen on the surface and balloons can lift the resources to the habitable zone.
* No magnetic field, agreed. Problem.
* Larger delta-V, less of an issue in the long run. It's easier to get to Detroit than Cuba from Toronto, but most people winter in Havana.
* Launch systems are easier that bioengineering.
* Water can be imported or synthesized. We'll have lots of extra O2 with all that CO2 we'll be converting.
* We haven't really looked at Venus. We've sent some soviet probes in for a couple of hours each back in the 80s, and they focused on the hellish surface.
In terms of long term development of human cities, I still think Venus is a far better candidate than Mars, even if Mars is easier for now.
Next, there's a huge amount of heat trapped in the atmosphere. "Fixing" it isn't just a matter of dumping comets full of water into the atmosphere, there's the slight matter of Venus being a whole lot closer to the sun that Earth, and receiving a much higher level of insolation.
All in all, the lack of a magnetic field is relatively minor compared to the other issues.
Flip side: Earth atmospheric gas mix at STP is actually a pretty efficient airship lifting gas on Venus and would provide about equivalent lift per unit volume 30-40km up in the stratosphere as hydrogen provides to a terrestrial airship at sea level. (In other words, you could in principle build a zeppelin where you could walk around inside the lift cells of in shirt sleeve conditions.) And there's still a chunk of atmosphere above that to provide radiation shielding. So a human "base" in the Venusian cloud tops is conceivable, albeit technically challenging.
Given your knowledge of the science fiction space, are you able to recommend any books that delve into what living/working in a Venusian cloud-top base might be like at the scientific level of Seveneves, or similar to the "slice of life" approach of PlanetES? I always had a thing for wanting to know more about the nitty gritty of living in such a "Cloud City" type of place.
So if you take it from the perspective "the atmosphere is fixed", and you pick either Mars or Venus, then Venus seems to be a better choice.
Both Mars and Venus would need some sort of radiation shield.
It is good that many other nations such as Russia, China, Japan, and India have recently been visiting such interest. But their quests are really dwarfed in terms of technology and vision.
The race against Soviet Union was what drove United States to its great height. Instead of spending resources on policing the world, space exploration is really the way to go. Investment allocation on intellectual capital through space exploration must be prioritized so that we can bring the best out of human civilization.