> The only serious advantage the car would have over the Tesla would be the 15 minute charger, which apparently isn't finished yet.
The Mission E looks much, much better than any Tesla model.
The Mission E looks much, much better than any Tesla model.
The Tesla appeals to a different class of person who is purchasing a car for different symbolic reasons.
Initially, the Toyota Prius 2nd Gen was panned for its ugly look, but ultimately its distinctiveness became a marketing point as it became a status symbol of its own right - as evidenced by Honda copying it in its 2nd generation Insight.
The subjective qualities that define the 'desirable look' of the Misson E may be rejected by some segments of the Tesla market.
modern 911s only vaguely hint at the originals. the size difference alone is enormous. http://a3.files.airows.com/image/upload/c_fit,cs_srgb,dpr_1....
The Model S looks have never been wonderful, nor distinctive. It's a great car. It's just not a great looker. The Porsche is a looker. We'll have to wait and see how the finished product performs.
One guy said, "Do you want to drive it? Other guy responded, "I've had a few--and just don't want to risk a DUI. You know how they are here."
I thought it was a slightly weird conversation. The vehicle just looked like a typical four door sedan. Typical for this area.
When it drove by, and I couldn't hear the engine, I realized why they had that conversation. My inner thought, while sitting on my tailgate of my old truck, was if I won the lottery---I would buy a yacht, and a Tesla.
Of course--a few good friends, to enjoy the toys, is the real wealth.
However, I suspect they will change the front bonnet design significantly in order to comply with pedestrian safety standards. Which would be very unfortunate for the aesthetics of the vehicle.