Hacker News Reader

HNHacker News

Top New Best Ask Show Jobs

Comment by com_kieffer | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

com_kieffer·

The same way that Stuxnet destroying Iranian centrifuges was an act of war ?

View on HN

Yes. Although I'd have thought that particular war would have started back with the hostage-taking in, what, 1979?

I really don't understand relationships between States.

always love a good reference to Argo.

I'm not a West Hater by any means, but I'd say the war started when the US and the UK engineered a coup in Iran because Iran nationalized their oil industry (after the British oil company running it refused to be audited or to renegotiate terms).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'%C3%A9tat

Whereas I'd say the problem was forced nationalisation.

A foreign coup is a valid response to nationalisation?

I'm not sure. But nationalisation is certainly a violation of rights.

Of course, I'd be interested to see how those assets were set up in the first place - my bet would be during a non-rights-respecting period of colonialism.

How far back do you go? (Serious question).

You go to when the country got a democratically elected government.

As for nationalisation is certainly a violation of rights do you hold that all eminent domain is a violation of rights? IE if the government wants to build a road and uses compulsory purchase orders it's a violation of rights?

Yes. It's possible to do such things in non rights violating ways. For example, buying options on properties and exercising them when a route is made.

That does not justify overthrowing another country's government. Most countries, including the United States, recognize the state's eminent domain over its land and its natural resources. Besides which, the Iranians tried to negotiate, the British refused, so the Iranians nationalized in response.

Starting point for international relations:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Realpolitik

Reply on news.ycombinator.com