Hacker News Reader

I don't see a problem with "2. Integrity Attacks (six devices)".

While of course proper XSRF protections must be applied to the firmware update script, I'd like to have a device where I can inspect and modify the firmware, thank you very much.

(Or, at the very least, expose u-boot over some interface that's available without destructive dismantling of the device)

View on HN

You don't think those protections should be in place for the 99% of users of these devices who have no idea what a firmware is, let alone would want to update them?

I believe so, yet the problem is that this is an excuse for manufacturers to prevent the 1% of people interested in their freedoms to restrict these freedoms for the gain of... what?

protecting the other 99% of their users from an attacker loading malicious firmware onto their device?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com