Could this get any "better"? Sure! We can even MITM all the OUTGOING https traffic if we want! #GitHubDDoS
* Recently un-trusted by Apple and Mozilla. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204938
Could this get any "better"? Sure! We can even MITM all the OUTGOING https traffic if we want! #GitHubDDoS
* Recently un-trusted by Apple and Mozilla. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204938
What does the GitHub DDOS have to do with MITM attacks on https?
To clear it up, I said that GFW "can" do (but has not yet done) these. But it tried to MITM some https traffic earlier with a non-trusted certificate as an experiment.
Imagine if China sent saboteurs in-country to physically destroy infrastructure being used by American businesses. That would Not Be Taken Lightly.
The root certificate thing is 'merely' a violation of the rights of their own subjects.
I really don't understand relationships between States.
Of course, I'd be interested to see how those assets were set up in the first place - my bet would be during a non-rights-respecting period of colonialism.
How far back do you go? (Serious question).
As for nationalisation is certainly a violation of rights do you hold that all eminent domain is a violation of rights? IE if the government wants to build a road and uses compulsory purchase orders it's a violation of rights?
> how that sort of behaviour doesn't constitute an act of war
You need photos of explosions and dead babies to convince your populace to go to war. Making a case for war between nuclear powers on the basis that "some website for geeks became a bit less reliable" isn't going to cut it.